On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-12-06 06:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > almost certainly a simple answer to this but in grepping through the
> > meta-ti layer for an unrelated reason, i came across this:
> >
> > conf/machine/include/omap4.inc:EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS += "u-boot"
> > conf/machine/include/omap3.inc:EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS += "u-boot x-load"
> >
> > which i thought was odd, since i have both a beagle and panda, and
> > both of them use TI's x-loader. so why would omap3.inc specifically
> > add x-load as an extra dependency, but not omap4.inc?
>
> Because U-Boot for the OMAP4 contains support for both MLO and
> U-Boot using the new "SPL" mode. Building u-boot will end up
> building both the MLO image as well as u-boot.img
ah, i knew there was a simple answer to that, thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
