On 02/26/2013 04:22 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:38:03PM -0500, Carlos Hernandez wrote: >> On 02/26/2013 03:26 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On 02/26/2013 03:12 PM, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: >>>> On 02/26/2013 02:53 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote: >>>>> + Cyril, >>>>> >>>>> Cyril had worked on adding GPH format for u-boot. Want to hear from him >>>>> why not used the u-boot-with-spl.bin build target. >>>>> >>>> Because u-boot-with-spl.bin does not wrap the spl image with a header >>>> that the rom bootloader understands. >>> What is the header we need? I assume it's not compatible with our >>> previous headers. And if it's just a convenience for programming the >>> flash, maybe we just stick with two files, to avoid further headaches >>> upstream? It's a general rule that concatenating files would make >>> programming easier, but it's a small savings on either end, yes? This >>> would also make the packaging easier since it would just be >>> SPL_IMAGE_FILE (or whatever) set to u-boot-spl.gph and so forth. Thanks! >>> >> I believe this is what the patch I submitted (to meta-arago) few >> days ago do. >> You need to define SPL_UART_BINARY in your recipe to enable the >> extra do_install and do_deploy functionality. > > Correct, but it doesn't support GPH yet, only SPL, AFAIK. Can you look into > extending it in such a way it can be used for any/all of the use cases easily?
Well, if it's just a header on the SPL binary we already have that as "MLO". -- Tom _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
