>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rini, Tom
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 11:11 AM
>> To: Dmytriyenko, Denys
>> Cc: Karicheri, Muralidharan; Hernandez, Carlos; meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [meta-ti] [RESEND: PATCH 2/3] keystone2: u-boot: update to add
>> gph
>> support
>>
>> On 05/07/2013 06:40 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:07:10PM -0400, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
>> [snip]
>> >>>>> + cd ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}
>> >>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK}
>> >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK}
>> >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_BINARY}
>> >>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_SYMLINK}
>> >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_SYMLINK}
>> >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SPL_BINARY}
>> >>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_SYMLINK}
>> >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_SYMLINK}
>> >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_BINARY}
>> >>>>> + rm -f ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_BINARY} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_SYMLINK}
>> >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_SYMLINK}
>> >>>>> + ln -sf ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SPI_GPH_BINARY} }
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As we just spoke - let's try to generalize this format and combine
>> >>>> it with other similar requirements, like SPL-UART etc. There was a
>> >>>> thread back in February about this...
>> >>
>> >> This is where I have disagreement. Let us restart the discussion. Who
>> >> are the stake holders? Discuss it in this thread rather than using an
>> >> old thread. I have copied here Carlos. I don't have bandwidth to
>> >> spend too much time on this. Let us discuss it and identify what is
>> >> required to be done.
>> >
>> > Sure, let's discuss. I encourage everyone to participate, especially
>> > Carlos and Tom.
>>
>> We should try and get the generic u-boot.inc to allow for a few different
>> variables to be
>> set by the machine.conf file, and if they are, copy/symlink them as needed.
>> I think we
>> should try and fit the SPI selection into the generic u-boot-with-spl.bin
>> framework that
>> exists in u-boot today if we can, and then add some logic so that we can
>> package and
>> symlink that single file instead.
I think we are unable to use the generic due to the specific header format
requirement from RBL (Rom
Boot loader). So we need to live with the format. How do we handle this with
the existing u-boot-spl.gph
formatting that we use?
>>
>> --
>> Tom
_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
