Hello Bruce, On Fri, 2023-11-03 at 09:59 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > In theory, I created the type=kmeta for just that purpose, kernel-cache and > fragment extensions, so keying on it is at least consistent :)
I had this feeling regarding type=kmeta, trying to understand the limited documentation and how to use it with file:// and nested directories. However, I find it extremely useful to have custom .scc files with the whole verification machinery in kernel-yocto.bbclass. I doubt that each and every use case must be upstreamed and go via yocto-kernel-cache, I believe users may have valid but very specific .scc tailored for their use cases. > > I can also try and think up another variable or a way to exclude that > > dependency So maybe another variable could be an answer. Because it's hard to distinguish real type-kmeta yocto-kernel-cache (especially if people would have their local, maybe partial mirrors) from just couple of .scc files. > But I do agree that it is pulling in (potential) support for ALL of the > features > in meta-virt. That's a balance between having too many fine grained > distro features, versus the one big switch "virtualization". > > It could be finer grained, let me see what I can come up with to slim things > down a bit .. but as it relates to the kernel-cache, even a more fine grained > trigger will want the kernel-cache for either virtualization, > containers, xen, etc. > > I'll follow up later today, once I've thought about this a bit more. -- Alexander Sverdlin Siemens AG www.siemens.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#8420): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/message/8420 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/102338788/21656 Group Owner: meta-virtualization+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
