On 23 August 2017 at 02:41, Alistair Francis
<alistair.fran...@xilinx.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Nathan Rossi <nat...@nathanrossi.com> wrote:
>> On 22 August 2017 at 04:07, Alistair Francis
>> <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com> wrote:
>>> This error is received while building
>>> services/std_svc/psci/psci_common.c: In function 
>>> 'psci_do_state_coordination':
>>> services/std_svc/psci/psci_common.c:220:27: error: array subscript is above
>>> array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
>>>   psci_req_local_pwr_states[pwrlvl - 1][cpu_idx] = req_pwr_state;
>>>
>>> Patch 555ebb34db8f3424c1b394df2f10ecf9c1f70901 explains why the error
>>> is seen and supposibly includes a fix. As the fix appears not to work,
>>> let's disable the error checking.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com>
>>
>> Applied.
>>
>>> ---
>>>  .../arm-trusted-firmware_2017.1.bb                 |  1 +
>>>  ...-Resolve-GCC-static-analysis-false-positi.patch | 40 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 
>>> recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/files/psci_common-Resolve-GCC-static-analysis-false-positi.patch
>>>
>>> diff --git 
>>> a/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.1.bb 
>>> b/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.1.bb
>>> index 52901f2..e68e5cf 100644
>>> --- a/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.1.bb
>>> +++ b/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.1.bb
>>> @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ SRCREV ?= "7d1a6732c9ae113999aeabcb9912369760d05c13"
>>>  PV = "1.3-xilinx-${XILINX_RELEASE_VERSION}+git${SRCPV}"
>>>
>>>  SRC_URI += "file://zynqmp-Remove-duplicate-const-declaration.patch"
>>> +SRC_URI += 
>>> "file://psci_common-Resolve-GCC-static-analysis-false-positi.patch"
>>> diff --git 
>>> a/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/files/psci_common-Resolve-GCC-static-analysis-false-positi.patch
>>>  
>>> b/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/files/psci_common-Resolve-GCC-static-analysis-false-positi.patch
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..f706585
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ 
>>> b/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/files/psci_common-Resolve-GCC-static-analysis-false-positi.patch
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
>>> +From 0197ad57b44fb7f10ca604891e0974110748fbd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> +From: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com>
>>> +Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:19:40 -0700
>>> +Subject: [PATCH] psci_common: Resolve GCC static analysis false positive
>>> +
>>> +Previously commit 555ebb34db8f3424c1b394df2f10ec attmpted to fix this
>>> +GCC issue:
>>> +
>>> +services/std_svc/psci/psci_common.c: In function 
>>> 'psci_do_state_coordination':
>>> +services/std_svc/psci/psci_common.c:220:27: error: array subscript is above
>>> +array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
>>> +  psci_req_local_pwr_states[pwrlvl - 1][cpu_idx] = req_pwr_state;
>>> +
>>> +This fix doesn't work as asserts aren't built in non-debug build flows.
>>> +Let's ensure this error is fixed for all build cases.
>>> +
>>> +Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com>
>>> +Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <nat...@nathanrossi.com>
>>> +---
>>> +Upstream Status: Pending
>>
>> For reference I don't think upstream will accept this patch, so it
>> might be better to resolve by enabling assertions on the zynqmp target
>> like is done for tegra. That way instead of a silent failure it will
>> result in a assertion failure which can be seen or debugged. But this
>> change is ok for the current Xilinx version of ATF which ties debug
>> with assertion support.
>
> At the moment it seems like they are willing to accept it. It has
> changed a little, but hopefully it will make it in. From there we
> should be able to port it to Xilinx's fork.
>
> https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/pull/1058

Looks like your pull request got merged (with modifications to the
change). Did you want to update the patch or get it applied to the
Xilinx v2017.3 ATF and then just replace v2017.1 once released?

Regards,
Nathan

>
> Thanks,
> Alistair
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nathan
>>
>>> +
>>> + lib/psci/psci_common.c | 2 ++
>>> + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>> +
>>> +diff --git a/lib/psci/psci_common.c b/lib/psci/psci_common.c
>>> +index 68cdd6eb..a8c94215 100644
>>> +--- a/lib/psci/psci_common.c
>>> ++++ b/lib/psci/psci_common.c
>>> +@@ -394,6 +394,8 @@ void psci_do_state_coordination(unsigned int 
>>> end_pwrlvl,
>>> +       plat_local_state_t target_state, *req_states;
>>> +
>>> +       assert(end_pwrlvl <= PLAT_MAX_PWR_LVL);
>>> ++      if (end_pwrlvl > PLAT_MAX_PWR_LVL)
>>> ++              return;
>>> +       parent_idx = psci_cpu_pd_nodes[cpu_idx].parent_node;
>>> +
>>> +       /* For level 0, the requested state will be equivalent
>>> +--
>>> +2.11.0
>>> +
>>> --
>>> 2.11.0
>>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> meta-xilinx mailing list
>> meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
-- 
_______________________________________________
meta-xilinx mailing list
meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx

Reply via email to