Hi Manju, I guess I'm definitely not understanding. I'm using a custom machine defined here ( https://github.com/kratsg/meta-l1calo/blob/master/conf/machine/gfex-prototype3.conf) which does inherit from zcu102-zynqmp -- but I override the MACHINE_DEVICETREE setting here. From what I understood, u-boot should be picking this up. (My custom layer is in bold below)
Giordon kratsg@dc:/local/d4/gstark/poky/build$ bitbake-layers show-layers layer path priority ========================================================================== meta /local/d4/gstark/poky/meta 5 meta-poky /local/d4/gstark/poky/meta-poky 5 meta-yocto-bsp /local/d4/gstark/poky/meta-yocto-bsp 5 meta-xilinx /local/d4/gstark/meta-xilinx 5 meta-oe /local/d4/gstark/meta-openembedded/meta-oe 6 meta-python /local/d4/gstark/meta-openembedded/meta-python 7 *meta-l1calo /local/d4/gstark/meta-l1calo 7* workspace /local/d4/gstark/poky/build/workspace 99 On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:39 AM Manjukumar Harthikote Matha < manju...@xilinx.com> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Giordon Stark [mailto:kra...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 9:05 AM > > To: Manjukumar Harthikote Matha <manju...@xilinx.com> > > Cc: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijm...@topic.nl>; Tang, Shaochun < > st...@bnl.gov>; > > meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org > > Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] Wrong DRAM set for custom board using FSBL + > u-boot? > > > > Hi Manju, > > > > Sure, but what is EXT_DTB and where do I set it/to what value? Googling > doesn't > > give me a lot of help here. > > > > Compile the dts to dtb and point the location of the DTB in EXT_DTB while > compiling u-boot. > > If you are using meta-xilinx-tools layer: > Edit > https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-xilinx-tools/blob/master/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-xlnx_%25.bbappend > and add > UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET_append = " > EXT_DTB=${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${MACHINE}-system.dtb" > > Thanks, > Manju > > > > Giordon > > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:03 AM Manjukumar Harthikote Matha > > <manju...@xilinx.com <mailto:manju...@xilinx.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: meta-xilinx-boun...@yoctoproject.org <mailto:meta-xilinx- > > boun...@yoctoproject.org> [mailto:meta-xilinx- <mailto:meta-xilinx-> > > > boun...@yoctoproject.org <mailto:boun...@yoctoproject.org> ] On > > Behalf Of Giordon Stark > > > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2017 10:26 PM > > > To: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijm...@topic.nl > > <mailto:mike.looijm...@topic.nl> > > > > Cc: Tang, Shaochun <st...@bnl.gov <mailto:st...@bnl.gov> >; > meta- > > xil...@yoctoproject.org <mailto:meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org> > > > Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] Wrong DRAM set for custom board using > FSBL + > > u-boot? > > > > > > Hi Mike, > > > > > > Is that part of the defconfig or am I looking somewhere else for > this? I > > suppose > > > you're not talking about the BOOTARGS here... > > > > > > > Compile the u-boot against the dtb using EXT_DTB > > > > Thanks, > > Manju > > > > > Giordon > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:08 AM Mike Looijmans > > <mike.looijm...@topic.nl <mailto:mike.looijm...@topic.nl> > > > <mailto:mike.looijm...@topic.nl <mailto:mike.looijm...@topic.nl> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Change looks okay, but you (may also) need to apply this > to the > > bootloader. > > > u-boot passes the memory size on to the kernel, and the > kernel just > > follows > > > what u-boot reports. > > > > > > On 07-12-17 21:35, Giordon Stark wrote: > > > > Thanks a lot for the explanation Nathan (and all). > > > > > > > > When I implement the change (see diff): > > > > > > > > diff --git > a/conf/machine/boards/gfex/prototype3/system-top.dts > > > > b/conf/machine/boards/gfex/prototype3/system-top.dts > > > > index 4e8ee15..e823bb8 100755 > > > > --- a/conf/machine/boards/gfex/prototype3/system-top.dts > > > > +++ b/conf/machine/boards/gfex/prototype3/system-top.dts > > > > @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ > > > > }; > > > > memory { > > > > device_type = "memory"; > > > > - reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>, > <0x00000008 > > 0x00000000 0x0 > > > > 0x80000000>; > > > > + reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>, > <0x00000008 > > 0x00000000 > > > > 0x00000003 0x80000000>; > > > > }; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > re-run bitbake, and re-program the board -- we still see > 4 GiB DRAM. > > Any > > > ideas? > > > > > > > > Giordon > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 8:49 PM Nathan Rossi > > <nat...@nathanrossi.com <mailto:nat...@nathanrossi.com> > > > <mailto:nat...@nathanrossi.com <mailto:nat...@nathanrossi.com> > > > > > <mailto:nat...@nathanrossi.com > > <mailto:nat...@nathanrossi.com> <mailto:nat...@nathanrossi.com > > <mailto:nat...@nathanrossi.com> > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 7 December 2017 at 11:37, Giordon Stark < > kra...@gmail.com > > <mailto:kra...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:kra...@gmail.com <mailto:kra...@gmail.com> > > > > > <mailto:kra...@gmail.com <mailto:kra...@gmail.com> > > <mailto:kra...@gmail.com <mailto:kra...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > > > > > Hi Alistair, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 7:23 PM Alistair Francis > > > <alistai...@gmail.com <mailto:alistai...@gmail.com> > > <mailto:alistai...@gmail.com <mailto:alistai...@gmail.com> > > > > > <mailto:alistai...@gmail.com <mailto: > alistai...@gmail.com> > > <mailto:alistai...@gmail.com <mailto:alistai...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Giordon Stark > > <kra...@gmail.com <mailto:kra...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:kra...@gmail.com <mailto:kra...@gmail.com> > > > > > <mailto:kra...@gmail.com <mailto:kra...@gmail.com> > > <mailto:kra...@gmail.com <mailto:kra...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > > > > >> > Hi Manju, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Indeed, you might be right... I guess now I'm > confused by > > why > > > Xilinx is > > > > >> > not > > > > >> > exporting the HDF to a device tree correctly: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Our block design has the DDR set to 16gigs > here: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/r8yzbvlf9kov8ei/Screenshot%202017-12- > > > 06%2018.40.29.png?dl=0 > > > > >> > Our HDF indicates 2 banks: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/atodjbt6jf5b4aw/Screenshot%202017-12- > > > 06%2018.42.34.png?dl=0 > > > > >> > > > > >> The second bank there is 45GB isn't it (it's > hard to count the > > f's)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In Xilinx SDK, first column is base addr, second > column is high > > addr > > > (from > > > > > xparameters.h I assume). So I'm reading the SDK > as: > > > > > > > > > > psu_ddr_0 0x0000_0000 -> 0x7fff_ffff > > > > > psu_ddr_1 0x8_0000_0000 -> 0xb_7fff_ffff > > > > > > > > > > which looks like 2GiBs for the first one, and > 15GiB for the > > second. > > > Maybe > > > > > I'm not doing the math right here.. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > The device tree right now seems to be saying: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > bank1 @ 0x0 of size 0x80000000 > > > > >> > bank2 @ 0x0 of size 0x80000000 > > > > >> > > > > >> The device tree is saying two banks. > > > > >> > > > > >> 1 bank: addr: 0 size of: 0x80000000 bytes > > > > >> 2 bank: addr: 0x800000000 size of 0x80000000 > bytes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How are you seeing this? I'm a bit confused, > since I understand > > > > registers as > > > > > > > > > > reg = <base size> > > > > > > > > > > but the device tree has a tuple of 4. So I'm not > understanding > > what > > > each > > > > > element in the tuple means semantically: > > > > > > > > Remember address-cells and size-cells are set at 2 > words, so the > > > > values are 2 sets of 2. Aka 64-bit addresses and > sizes. > > > > > > > > https://github.com/kratsg/meta- > > > > > l1calo/blob/master/conf/machine/boards/gfex/prototype3/zynqmp.dtsi#L16 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>, <0x00000008 > 0x00000000 > > 0x0 > > > 0x80000000>; > > > > > > > > > > Bank 1: A1=0x0 A2=0x0 A3=0x0 > A4=0x80000000 > > > > > Bank 2: A1=0x00000008 A2=0x00000000 A3=0x0 > > A4=0x80000000 > > > > > > > > It looks like DTG has generated the upper word for > the second > > bank > > > > size incorrectly? or maybe the issue is that the > second bank > > address > > > > range is larger than the available memory? Not sure > the problem > > on the > > > > Vivado/HDF/DTG side. > > > > > > > > Either way the reg property should probably be: > > > > > > > > reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>, <0x00000008 > 0x00000000 > > > 0x00000003 0x80000000>; > > > > > > > > 1 bank: addr: 0x0_0000_0000 size of: 0x0_8000_0000 > bytes > > > > 2 bank: addr: 0x8_0000_0000 size of: 0x3_8000_0000 > bytes > > > > > > > > 0x3_8000_0000 + 0x8000_0000 = 0x4_0000_0000 == 16 GiB > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Nathan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the sizes seem wrong to me. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I'm guessing the 1st and 3rd blocks here > (size=0x0) could be > > safely > > > > >> > deleted. > > > > >> > > > > >> No, don't delete them. > > > > >> > > > > >> > So I'm misunderstanding this. Is there a > reason for this not to > > > match? A > > > > >> > bug? > > > > >> > > > > >> Can you confirm that your project is set to 16GB > of memory (I > > don't > > > > >> know how to do that). Otherwise you can just > edit the device > > tree. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We set the DDR in the PS of the block design to > 16 GiB as > > referenced > > > in > > > > this > > > > > screenshot: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/r8yzbvlf9kov8ei/Screenshot%202017-12- > > > 06%2018.40.29.png?dl=0 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the help so far! Greatly > appreciate it, > > > > > > > > > > Giordon > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Mike Looijmans > > > System Expert > > > > > > TOPIC Products > > > Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best > > > Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best > > > Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79 <+31%20499%20336%20979> > <tel:+31%20499%20336%20979> > > <tel:+31%20499%20336%20979> > > > E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com > > <mailto:mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com> > > > <mailto:mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com > > <mailto:mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com> > > > > Website: www.topicproducts.com < > http://www.topicproducts.com> > > <http://www.topicproducts.com> > > > > > > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > meta-xilinx mailing list > > > > > meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org <mailto:meta- > > xil...@yoctoproject.org> <mailto:meta- <mailto:meta-> > > > xil...@yoctoproject.org <mailto:xil...@yoctoproject.org> > > > <mailto:meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org <mailto: > meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org> > > <mailto:meta- <mailto:meta-> > > > xil...@yoctoproject.org <mailto:xil...@yoctoproject.org> > > > > > > > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
-- _______________________________________________ meta-xilinx mailing list meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
