Hi Jean-Francois, Appreciate your input, however, since we don't use meta-xilinx-tools, the workaround of a dual dependency (from both image- and u-boot) towards PMUFW appears more feasible for us.
Thanks, Martin ________________________________________ From: Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagen...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 2:31:30 PM To: Martin Siegumfeldt Cc: Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego; meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH 9/9] zynqmp-pmu: Remove class that uses a multilib hack to build standalone components On Dec 12, 2018, at 3:21 AM, Martin Siegumfeldt <m...@gomspace.com<mailto:m...@gomspace.com>> wrote: It looks to me as Manju's proposal of adding it as an image dependency may work when building the image, but appears to be subject to a race condition between pmu-firmware and virtual/bootloader. I instigated the idea to transform the fsbl build from a class to a proper recipe and tying it the the wic stage using. I then had to resolve this same race and if I remember correctly, the fix looked like this: https://www.mail-archive.com/meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org/msg02458.html Not sure if it applies to your specific situation here. I have not invested much time in the multi-config stuff. I resorted to meta-xilinx-tools a while back, managed to "make it work" in our CI docker environment and have not looked back since. -- _______________________________________________ meta-xilinx mailing list meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
