"W. Trevor King" <wk...@tremily.us> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:49:08AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > public-inbox is my opinionated policy layer; but ssoma was intended
> > to be generic.
>
> Fair enough. Maybe I'm looking for a generic ssoma-archive-to-HTTP
> server (like public-inbox.cgi) that is independent of the opinionated
> filtering in public-inbox-mda?
You can use public-inbox.{cgi,psgi} independenty of the -mda.
I'm not sure how well it does with HTML portions (that's stripped or
converted by -mda); but it should probably only show text/plain
parts.
I doubt there's a risk HTML tag injection since we're required to
sanitize plain-text mail, too, but (I think) HTML will be shown in
source form at the moment. Of course you can filter/reject HTML
at the MTA layer, too
But of course web design is totally opinionated, too.
I design for lynx and w3m and reject all use of JS/graphics :)
--
unsubscribe: meta+unsubscr...@public-inbox.org
archive: http://public-inbox.org/meta/
