On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:38:47PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstan...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> <snip>
> 
> > That said, should public-inbox consider this case when generating the 
> > /raw and /t.mbox.gz messages? If the Archived-At and List-Archive 
> > headers are listed in the DKIM-Signature header, skip inserting them 
> > into the generated message?
> 
> Fwiw, I've been wondering if they are even necessary.  I don't
> think anybody misses them with -imapd.  So I prefer to just drop
> them and have less code:

Right on, I'm good with that.

-K

Reply via email to