On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 12:37 PM Eric Wong <e...@80x24.org> wrote:
>
> Filipe Manana <fdman...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried both 'master' branch and tag v1.8.0, I did the documented build 
> > steps:
> >
> > $ git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git/
> > $ cd public-inbox
> >
> > $ perl Makefile.PL
> > $ make
> > $ echo $? # success, prints 0
> >
> > $ cd certs
> > $ /usr/bin/perl ./create-certs.perl
> > $ cd ..
> > $ make test
> > (...)
>
> Any messages about missing dependencies when running tests?
> (e.g. Xapian)
>
> Inline::C or Socket::Msghdr shouldn't be required with 1.8
> on most arches...
>
> > All tests successful.
> > Files=157, Tests=6785, 491 wallclock secs ( 0.77 usr  0.13 sys + 39.65
> > cusr 14.90 csys = 55.45 CPU)
>
> Fwiw, "make check" or "make check-run" can be a lot faster on SMP.

Oh, I didn't know about it. Good to know.

>
> > Result: PASS
> >
> > $ make symlink-install
> >
> > $HOME/bin is included in my $PATH, but when I run 'lei', I get an error:
> >
> > $ lei q -o ~/Mail/overlay -I https://lore.kernel.org/all -t
> > 'dfn:fs/btrfs/* AND rt:3.month.ago..'
> > Attempt to reload PublicInbox/LeiXSearch.pm aborted.
>
> Odd, "Attempt to reload %s aborted" coming from perl itself means it
> already tried and failed before.  (man perldiag)
>
> Were there previous errors from other commands?
>
> Perhaps it's already running lei-daemon as an older version?
> "lei daemon-kill" should kill it and it'll restart on the next
> command, unless something else got wedged.

Ah, running "lei daemon-kill" fixed it.
I don't know if I did something wrong before, but after running that,
lei is now working fine.

Thanks!

>
> I've been meaning to make the daemon stuff "worth it"
> w.r.t. automatic updates/flag/keyword sync (inotify/IDLE) but
> haven't gotten around to it, yet :x
>
> > Compilation failed in require at
> > /home/fdmanana/git/hub/public-inbox/lib/PublicInbox/LeiQuery.pm line
> > 74.
> >
> > This is on a Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS distro.
> > I have it working on a Debian SID box without any problems (it was set
> > up several months ago).
> >
> > Any ideas about what's wrong?
>
> Probably daemon-kill will get rid of an old version that's
> already running (and verifying that it's actually dead).

Reply via email to