>> I can think of 2 kind of solutions : >> >> 1) solution based on signature >> The programmer put his signature in his runtime and in his stacks. When >> opening a stack, the runtime checks if the stack has the right signature. >> The process could be a "compress+encrypt" function built in the engine and a >> "decompress+decrypt" function build in the runtime. > >1.1) Why not as an RSA public/private keys encryptation system, stored, as a >metatalk script, in an encrypted client-side home stack or its substitute, >suitable, without any changes, with the actual 2.3.1 issue of MC ? > Pierre, please pojnt the way! I'd like to know how to script, it. What maths is involved? Is there an RFC? What would be the security loopholes etc... Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/ Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
