Re: Feature request: clone as substack

[Geoff Canyon]

on 9/19/00 2:02 AM, David Bovill at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> If you are doing anything fancy with cloning multiple windows it would be
> really nice to be able to have the new cloned stack behave as a sub-stack,
> and be able to use the main stacks scripts without a lot of fiddling (ie
> send) or using the stack (which can interfere with the global environment.

This is off the top of my head, but if you had a stack "smith" with a
substack "jones" wouldn't something like this work:

clone stack "jones"
set the name of it to "jones clone"
set the mainstack of it to "smith"

and then proceed as normal. In a stack, if you don't want persistence you'd
have to not save, or delete the clone before saving. In an application there
is no saving, therefore no problem.

gc



Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.