am 14.03.2002 17:51 Uhr schrieb Gregory Lypny unter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Hi Everyone, > > Just wanted to confirm the correct way to set up arrays to be able > to do matrix math. If I have an array named X, does MetaCard treat > x[3,4] as the fourth element in the third row of X and x[8,2] as the > second element in the eigth row? > > Regards, > > Greg > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > Gregory Lypny > Associate Professor > Concordia University > ____________________________________________________________ > "They had the best selection, > The were poisoned by protection, > There was nothing that they needed, > They had nothing left to find." > - Neil Young > > > E-mail forum: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Visit Pareto at http://rubbersoul.concordia.ca > Visit Borsa at http://rubbersoul.concordia.ca/Borsa_Classroom > Crash site for notes and quizzes at > http://homepage.mac.com/gregorylypny/FileSharing1.html > > > _______________________________________________ > metacard mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard Hi Greg,
I think so, but the worse (sorry, my English is very poor, I'm a German, or so?) is, that, how Scott me just mailed, you can't adress row's and column's in array's. So I think, a 2-dimensional array brings no advantage and must just be handled like a 1-dimensional one. Is it right? Regards Wolfgang Dr. Wolfgang Rost, Psychologist and Software-Developer, Germany _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard