Hey, Shari... if it's not too proprietary, could you tell us what you ended up doing? Some of us might be interested in protecting our stacks in the same way...
Thanks, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:39 PM Subject: Passkeys and registrations > One thing that Metacard could do that would be so helpful, is to be > able to set a password for a mainstack, without also encrypting all > of the embedded stacks. > > That would allow us to put primary code where it belonged, encrypt > it, without also encrypting stacks that would "break" if encrypted. > > I ran the standalone thru a simple hack test. And it passed with > flying colors :-) Something in Scott's primary Metacard code, > probably one of his self-protections, also protects us. Am very > pleased with this discovery. > > Shari C > -- > --Shareware Games for the Mac-- > http://www.gypsyware.com > _______________________________________________ > metacard mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard > _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
