Richard Gaskin wrote: > > Of the many folks using my MC-base WebMerge product over the last two years, > I've never had a support case like this one, and am hoping some of you may > be able to offer some insight: > > When I run the WebMerge tutorial here on the slowest machine I have (Win 95, > 300MHz), it generates the tutoprial pages in 3.9 seconds. I have a > customer running Win98 on a 1.7GHz maxchine and the same files take 4 > minutes to process.(!) > > Most of what WebMerge does is parsing and concatenating text, and of course > creating files. Not particularly atom-splitting stuff, and I've never seen > a performance disparity even close to this. > > I've verified that we're using the same fles, have the same version of > WebMerge (using the MC 2.4.2 engine), and in all other respects his system > is far superior to the one I've been testing on. > > Any clues? > > -- > Richard Gaskin > Fourth World Media Corporation > Developer of WebMerge 2.2: Publish any database on any site > ___________________________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com > Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc > > _______________________________________________ > metacard mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
Hi Richard, Did you ask him about testing others comparable stacks on both your and his computer, other softs and so on ? In others words, are realy sure that metacard and webmerge are realy in fault. For my own, i did'nt have any speed troubbles in using webmerge. Other questions ? Is the 1.7 GHz connected to a LAN ? Is this box including in a Netware network ? Is the box running a desktop or a lan anti-virus, etc... Best Regards, Pierre _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard