The difference may be that any bit of script may be taken by yahoo for commercial exploitation for free
and without recourse to legal action in case they would want to take it back. As they say, you grant yahoo
the royalty-free.... bla bla bla...

This is not the case with GPL or SourceForge. if Im correct.

Also Im pretty sure we dont have the grant or warrant from the owner that they do so...

Correct me if im wrong...
---------------------=---------------------
Xavier Bury
TNS NT LAN Server
ext 6465



David Bovill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

12/09/03 03:18
Please respond to metacard

       
        To:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        cc:        ^
        Subject:        Re: SourceForge vs Yahoo



Richard Gaskin wrote:
> MisterX wrote:
>
>
>>it's probably changed now but this was yahoo's agreement..
>>
>>By submitting Content to any Yahoo property, you automatically grant, or
>>warrant that the owner of such Content has expressly granted, Yahoo the
>>royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive and fully sublicensable
>>right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate,
>>create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such Content
>>(in whole or part) worldwide and/or to incorporate it in other works in any
>>form, media, or technology now known or later developed.
>
>
> If mctools.mc is made public domain, what difference does it make?
>

None

_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard




Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com

IMPORTANT MESSAGE

Internet communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream International does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Clearstream International or of any of its affiliates or subsidiaries.

END OF DISCLAIMER

Reply via email to