[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jacque wrote:
"Somebody should test it on platforms other than Mac.
[...]
if the lookAndFeel is "Macintosh" or the lookAndFeel is "Appearance
Manager" then
put twidth - 24 into anfangrechts
repeat with i = 2 to nchoices + 1 -- JG
set the right of button i to anfangrechts
subtract the width of button i from anfangrechts
subtract 12 from anfangrechts
set the bottom of button i to the height of this stack - 20
end repeat
else
repeat with i = 2 to nchoices + 1
set the left of button i to round(curx)
add the width of button i + iwidth to curx
set the bottom of button i to the height of this stack - 16
end repeat
end if
set the default of btn 2 to true -- JG
[...]
As my Windows XP returns "Appearance manager" for lookandfeel, WinXP and Mac
will display the buttons in the same order. Although there is some
inconsistency, XP tends to use the alternative button ordering.
Right. In my revisions it now takes into account both the platform and
the lookAndFeel to determine the appropriate icons and button placement.
FWIW, Windows has no "Appearance Manager", so that token is a red
herring. Hopefully we'll see it depricated eventually in favor of
something more universally applicable, like maybe "OSnative".
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
___________________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard