This was in early 2005... I seriously dont remember.
I know i was asked to get in then removed without consideration. Given all the bugzillas i wrote from 2004 until mid 2005 I never got ever aknowledged
despite repeated requests to support, i seriously gave up requesting anything from support who usually responded
with the lamest excuses (sorry, that's how this customer felt).
Despite repeated and direct exchanges with Kevin, the same mistakes keep coming - not that Kevin answered often. Not that these weren't repeated in Monterey by Dan - and later aknowledged with some bugzilla feedback... It was but too late and too little in my opinion. meanwhile useless for business graphics are more bugs are introduced...
What's the use? Hundreds of hours in their benefit entering bugzillas, repeating the issues to hopefully someone who could direct their processes and quality and then being ignored up to this release
is not my responsibility to fix.
If i update to Rev enterprise (peanuts money for my company - not for my personal license though), i still have 1 case that is since 1999 blamed on windows drivers when the fault is clearly in rev/mc engine.
That was later posted as bugzilla 1076... For the life of me, i couldn't release a metacard based software to any of our 3000 users in the company since we all use terminal services or metaframe servers...
Superb isn't it?!
i just lost the hope that my help or critiques could help...
cheers
Xavier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 16.02.2006 09:11:54:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > For some reason, and after lots of asking my studio license was inserted
> > in the list.
> >
> > Then it was removed by Heather - and she never looked if i wasn't also an
> > enterprise user.
>
> People make mistakes, and cross-referencing every license holder may not
> be the top priority on her mind during a release cycle.
>
> What did she say when you wrote to her with your Enterprise license
> asking to be reinstated?
>
> That is, you _did_ write her, yes?
>
> --
> Richard Gaskin
> Fourth World Media Corporation
> ___________________________________________________________
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
> _______________________________________________
> metacard mailing list
> metacard@lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
To make communications with Clearstream easier, Clearstream has
recently changed the email address format to conform with industry
standards. The new format is '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com
IMPORTANT MESSAGE
Internet communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream
International does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of
this message.
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or
any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this e-mail are
those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically
states them to be the views of Clearstream International or of any of
its affiliates or subsidiaries.
EN
D OF DISCLAIMER
_______________________________________________ metacard mailing list metacard@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
