On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 13:24, Jean-Claude Wippler wrote: > Kristian G. Kvilekval wrote:
> > No, "fits in memory" is not considered. > > What does matter is the order or adds/deletes. Space is reclaimed and > re-used, when fill drops too low - there is hysteresis, i.e. the same > number of rows can have a different hash table size depending on how > entries were added and deleted. > > Same build order, different platform? (if so, there could be a bug) Both systems are: x86 linux 2.4.22 debian/unstable Entries should be unique: they are urls taken from a local directory hierarchy and the test directory is actually a mirror. No duplicates, no deletes, but insert order could be different. Still I notice that there was some discrepancy in the size of the database so that suggests something was different. -- email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] office:(805)893-4276 http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~kris _______________________________________________ metakit mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.equi4.com/mailman/listinfo/metakit
