I'd be happy to hear what the problem was. I'm still packaging metalink but it required a new upstream release because some source files where missing their license, so the packaging was dropped dead till a new release is made (which I still have not found the time for).
Currently I'm also reading up on Python packaging and I hope the packaging of libmetalink is still going forward, because then I can get metalink to depend on that in the new version. For all the packages I havn't been able to get into Ubuntu yet, I'll be publishing preliminary work on packages in my personal packaging archive: https://launchpad.net/~bneijt/+archive Any comments, requests etc. are welcome. Bram On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 00:06 -0500, Anthony Bryan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Nicolas Alvarez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Anthony Bryan wrote: > >> # I couldn't get any of the metalink > >> # generators to work, so this was born. > > > > That is definitely a problem we should address... Thomas saw none of the > > generators worked, and wrote his own. But other people could give up with > > metalinks if they can't use the generators. > > good point, glad you brought it up! > > I contacted him to try & find out if they really didn't work, or if > this was due to documentation, or bad marketing (the website should > have something really simple to explain this). > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metalink Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
