Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: >> And I think a philosophical discussion of "representation vs. >> description vs. complete view" in general and of the intension the >> authors of 1997 and 1998 RFCs had in particular is non-sense. > > I am not sure how 1997/8 are related to this.
Those seem to be years, not RFC numbers. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metalink Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
