On Jul 4, 5:10 am, Hampus Wessman <[email protected]> wrote: > Anthony Bryan skrev: > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Peter Poeml<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 04:27:53PM -0400, Ant Bryan wrote: > > >>> (a) <metadata> name > >>> no one has a better name for URIs to torrents/metalinks? :) > > >> Things I thought of were > >> "metaurl" > >> "alternative location" > >> "other description" > >> "p2p" > > > I like "metaurl". anyone else have a preference? > > I like that too.
I've changed it to "metaurl" which I think fits nicely with "url" - please check to make sure there are no more references to a "metadata" element. :) I keep seeing spots I missed! in a similar way, "metaurl" element now has a "name" attribute (mirroring the "file" element) for singling out a single file in a multi-file torrent/metalink/whatever. 4.2.9.3. The "name" Attribute metalink:metaurl elements MAY have a "name" attribute that indicates a specific file in a BitTorrent .torrent file or a Metalink Document that describes multiple files. Directory information can also be contained in a "path/file" format only, as in: <metaurl name="debian-amd64/sarge/Contents-amd64.gz"> In this example, a file named "Contents-amd64.gz" is indicated, in a "debian-amd64/sarge/" subdirectory. The path MUST NOT contain any directory traversal directives or information. The path MUST be relative. The path MUST NOT begin with a "/", "./" or "../", contain "/../", or end with "/..". in both name attributes, the file and directory names are in quote now: "Contents-amd64.gz" and "debian-amd64/sarge/" In this example, a file named "Contents-amd64.gz" is indicated, in a "debian-amd64/sarge/" subdirectory. also, updated REC-xmldsig-core reference to second edition. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metalink Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
