I think mimetype could be useful. The other tags aren't that important, IMHO. Just my two cents. / Hampus
Anthony Bryan skrev, Den 2009-07-26 00:19: > I should have a slightly updated version of this up soon. > > here are the elements that are not in the ID. I've seen <mimetype> in > use, that may be worth adding to the ID? > > <changelog>, <tags>, <mimetype>, <relations>, <releasedate>, > <mulitmedia>, <screenshot>, <upgrade>, <bittorrent> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Anthony Bryan<[email protected]> wrote: > >> somehow this got passed on & the "third edition" was never finished. >> it's a shame because the older version is less accurate/updated. >> >> I'm going to try to finish it up in the next few weeks, so people have >> something reliable to go by until the ID is finished. >> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Anthony Bryan<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> ugh, what's wrong? >>> >>> I've tried to incorporate all the comments and uploaded new drafts to >>> http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion/files >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Bram Neijt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I think the biggest reason for 3339 becoming the chosen format was >>>> because XML schema datatypes uses it ( >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#dateTime ) >>>> >>>> Looking into this further, I think you might have a point. Just >>>> checking "new Date('1937-01-01T12:00:27.87+00:20')" fails :-S >>>> >>>> Bram >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Nils <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > I know that a lot of languages have either rfc 822 or 2822 support, >>>> > while most are lacking 3339. >>>> > Javascript, the language of dTa, has support to parse 822 and 2822 and >>>> > generate 2822, but lacks 3339. >>>> > While it shouldn't be that hard to roll out some custom implementation >>>> > I still don't see the advantages of 3339 over e.g. 2822. >>>> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metalink Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
