Anthony Bryan wrote:
>
> (See fwded msg for details).
>
> I'll replace the references to ISO639-2/RFC 3066 with RFC 4646 for
> now, & try to keep on top of when draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis gets an RFC
> number.
>
> Do you know if our schema needs to be modified beyond substituting RFC
> numbers in there?
>
> # As defined in RFC 3066
> metalinkLanguageTag = xsd:string {
> pattern = "[A-Za-z]{1,8}(-[A-Za-z0-9]{1,8})*"
> }
>
>
I'd like to drop metalink:language, metalink:description,
metalink:publisher, etc. in favor of using dublin core tags inside
metalink:file. We shouldn't try to define our own metadata system;
no matter how hard we try, it will remain incomplete compared to existing
standards like dublin core.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Metalink Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
