On Aug 18, 7:18 am, Nicolas Alvarez <[email protected]> wrote: > Nicolas Alvarez wrote: > > About 3 and 4: as I said in another post, I think it would be a good idea > > to *get rid of all metadata tags in the metalink namespace*, and reuse an > > existing metadata format like Dublin Core instead. > > >http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-xml-guidelines/ > > Any comments on this?
Since the format changed significantly from ml3 I think it would be a good time to think about this. I like Dublin Core, too, and I'm generally for using it, however there are a few things to consider: * There are a few DC related rfc. However they seem to be "Informational". I don't know how this would affect metalink standardization. * Should there be a lot of DC elements that generators should use (as opposed to other elements). How would we map the current set of elements to DC elements? * Can all of the current elements be easily mapped? Which elements must stay? Nils --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metalink Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
