Yeah a quick look at pyaxelws code sure looks similar to what I've already
done.  Perhaps I need to rebrand the guts of metalink checker into some
kind of Python download library.

Neil

On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:27:17 -0500, Anthony Bryan <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Neil M. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Wow, I just took a look at pyaxel.  Its really, really basic right now.
>> You might want to suggest to either the pyaxel and/or pyaxelws to grab
my
>> download library from Metalink Checker, similar to what the guy did
with
>> GGet.  I've already got proxy and FTP support, which they don't.  And
of
>> course Metalink!
> 
> I mentioned Checker in the feature request but I see the link to SVN
> in there no longer works
> 
> http://code.google.com/p/pyaxelws/issues/detail?id=3
> 
>> Alternatively we could take what comes out of pyaxel and see if we can
>> gut
>> it and put my code at the core instead of pyaxel.
> 
> I think the authors would be ok w/ code contributions. pyaxel &
> pyaxelws only have a few hundred downloads total, unless you want to
> support a third pyaxelMetalinkChecker :)
> 
> could you get in touch w/ them on that feature request if you're
> interested?
> 
>> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:08:00 -0500, Anthony Bryan
>> <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> could be a way to someday have Metalink support in Chrome-ish? it
>>> seems that there's some python that interacts w/ an extension.
>>>
>>> http://code.google.com/p/pyaxelws/
>>>
>>> http://code.google.com/p/pyaxelws/issues/detail?id=3
>>>
>>> "Pyaxelws is an extended version of pyaxel, a CLI based download
>>> accelerator in Python."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> (( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
>   )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metalink Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en.

Reply via email to