Il giorno lunedì 16 marzo 2020 23:33:38 UTC+1, Norman Megill ha scritto:
>
> If someone has better access to historical sources, please feel free to 
> correct me.
>
> Norm
>

Hi, Norm!
This is my first message in the group, so first of all I would like to 
thank you for Metamath; one of my dreams was to build an automated theorem 
prover, but after discovering Metamath (and mmj2), I saw that there was 
everything that I wanted to do and better than I would have done.
Well, access to historical sources...
I suppose the answer is "Arithmetices principia, nova methodo exposita"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetices_principia,_nova_methodo_exposita
https://archive.org/details/arithmeticespri00peangoog/page/n7/mode/2up 
(original book in latin)
https://github.com/mdnahas/Peano_Book/blob/master/Peano.pdf (english 
translation, not complete)
In brief:
1. In the "Arithmetices principia" there is the first presentation of Peano 
Axioms and the first appearance of the symbol epsilon
2. Peano explicitly recognizes the influence of Grassmann and Dedekind (on 
page V, so it is quite fair to say Dedekind-Peano axioms)
3. Peano was actually doing naive set theory (proposition 57 on page XII)
4. Peano chose the symbol epsilon because it is the first letter of the 
word ἐστί (es-tee'), third person singular present active indicative of the 
verb "to be" in ancient Greek
If you want to read it, enjoy reading! It's pretty much Metamath 0.1

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/06013d9f-07fb-40f7-86ba-5ea04ba35e6e%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to