Hi all,

For the record, there are two (related) mistakes in my write-up (the
picture in my March 23 email):

   - The properties (0) and (1) of sup are of course only correct for
   *upper-bounded* V.
   - Therefore in the steps where we use these properties, we need to know
   that |f| and |f*g| are upper bounded, so we *do* use the |f|≤1
   assumption.

And the good news is that I discovered these when studying Stan's
http://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/imo72b2.html. :-)

Groetjes,
 <><
Marnix

Op ma 23 mrt. 2020 om 18:38 schreef Marnix Klooster <
[email protected]>:

> Hi Stan,
>
> If I were to formalize this in Metamath, I'd use the first proof, but in a
> more calculational format.
>
> I've attached it, unfortunately as a picture.
>
> Yes, this is a longer proof, but it seems somehow easier to me.
>
> Hope this helps someone... :-)
>
> [image: image.png]
>
>
> Groetjes,
>  <><
> Marnix
>
> Op do 27 feb. 2020 om 18:08 schreef 'Stanislas Polu' via Metamath <
> [email protected]>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm quite a beginner with Metamath (I have read a bunch of proofs, most
>> of the metamath book, I have implemented my own verifier, but I haven't
>> constructed any original proof yet) and I am looking to formalize the
>> following proof:
>>
>> IMO B2 1972: http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/demos/exercise/exercise.pdf
>> Alternative version:
>> http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/demos/exercise/exercise2.pdf
>>
>> (More broadly, I think this would be an interesting formalization to have
>> in set.mm given this old but nonetheless interesting page:
>> http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/demos/index.html)
>>
>> I am reaching out to the community to get direction on how should I go
>> about creating an efficient curriculum for myself in order to achieve that
>> goal? Any other advice is obviously welcome!
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> -stan
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Metamath" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/78223c8d-eddf-4f84-970d-6b0cbb20dab9%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/78223c8d-eddf-4f84-970d-6b0cbb20dab9%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
>
> --
> Marnix Klooster
> [email protected]
>


-- 
Marnix Klooster
[email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAF7V2P9BKgAORpE2j6COqZmqD%2B7R5yHfZPnUg3Qpk4DQ3D0ZXQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to