Yes, what I believe is that the small circles actually have to touch the 
bi-bisected lines. This is a trisection. But not in 3 thesame angels. The 
middle angle is a little bigger than the 2 outside. What I asked myself is if 
the twoo (samesized) circles are (of course according to it's ratio) like 
double or triple sized. Wich differs in areal size or circumference length. If 
you compare a circle to a square and you try to square the circle, than the 
surface area gives a different square than if you square the circumference.
Square root of 2 is irrational, but it's constructible. I don't know if I get 
anything you say.
I created the trisection myself.

With friendly regards,

Dirk-Anton Broersen

Verzonden vanuit Outlook Mobile<https://aka.ms/blhgte>


________________________________
Van: Jim Kingdon <[email protected]>
Verstuurd: zondag 10 mei 2020 22:44
Aan: [email protected]; Dirk-Anton Broersen; [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [Metamath] Trisecting an angle

I assume this is in reference to item 8 on http://us.metamath.org/mm_100.html . 
In case the rules of that game aren't clear, 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_trisection seems to cover it (especially 
the link to Straightedge and compass construction).

I assume the next step on that one would be formalizing straightedge and 
compass construction. Is this some subset of the Tarski axioms or is it more 
complicated than that? Not that I'm likely to change gears from trying to prove 
that the square root of two is irrational in iset.mm, but I suppose who knows 
what might eventually catch my fancy?

On May 10, 2020 8:26:33 AM PDT, Dirk-Anton Broersen <[email protected]> wrote:
Here’s my form of trisecrting an angle,

Notice the small little circles are related to the bisected circles. I think on 
surface area. If this is untrue, please let me notice. It seems untrue. If you 
know that a surface area circle combined to a square differce from thesame 
circumference length differce from the square. It might makes you doubt. What 
I’m saying is that the surface area is important to those circles.

[cid:[email protected]]


With friendly regards,

Dirk-Anton Broersen

Verzonden vanuit Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> voor 
Windows 10



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/HE1P189MB028210793FC83444F445942E83A00%40HE1P189MB0282.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.

Reply via email to