On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:41 PM [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > 2. Since no new assumptions can be introduced, I'm not sure if all axioms > contained in set.mm suffice to allow the formulation of all the remaining > proofs in the MM100, or say, even cutting edge research. Is this known? Do > current mathematical researchers know for certain that their assumptions are > restricted to ZFC?
The 100 theorems on that list should all be consequences of ZFC. Only fairly specialized mathematics needs stronger axioms than ZFC. I don't know how certain you want, but as far as I know stronger axioms are pretty rare, with the possible exception of the Continuum Hypothesis. -- The standard is written in English . If you have trouble understanding a particular section, read it again and again and again . . . Sit up straight. Eat your vegetables. Do not mumble. -- _Pascal_, ISO 7185 (1991) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAMZ%3Dzj5XNKBAG89x-ZjFhzD8JfTC0NBmB2rWu8AdjQ%3DC5aM2_Q%40mail.gmail.com.
