Not a very productive contribution to the discussion, but I'm posting it 
anyway: as someone who is still relatively new to ITPs but investing a lot 
of my spare time into Lean for maths, I find this idea very exciting. I 
have been writing rust professionally for a long time, and I also think it 
would be a good, practical implementation language. Also agree on the 
sentiment about writing a text editor. Definitely interested as a user and 
maybe more.

[email protected] schrieb am Samstag, 21. November 2020 um 04:30:36 UTC+1:

> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:22 PM Raph Levien <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Regarding writing an editor. I agree it's a big task and hard to do 
>> right. That said, it's also something I'm interested in. I know there's at 
>> least one other editor project on Druid (not my own), and we also have 
>> interest in unbundling our (Druid's) multiline text widget so it's possible 
>> to integrate other functionality on top of it.
>>
>
> Yes, I'm aware of the Xi editor and my comment wasn't at all meant to 
> throw shade on it! I think it's a cool project, and from the demos I've 
> seen it looks pretty slick, if a bit raw (I don't know how much it has 
> progressed in the meantime). But I'm sure you can attest that it's not a 
> job for the faint-hearted! Of course if the *goal* is to build a good text 
> editor then it's a feasible project, but building a good text editor and 
> also a good proof assistant at the same time is probably a poor separation 
> of concerns.
>
> If you want help on specifically the Druid parts, you might be able to 
>> come by the #druid channel on xi.zulipchat.com and stir up some interest.
>>
>> Raph
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 2:31 PM vvs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Whoa! And I'm already spoiled by what Leo is doing with Lean 4. The so 
>>> small core language and vastly extensible parser with an entire automation 
>>> library for building and proving formal systems using incremental 
>>> compilation with plans for interactive compiler guidance are mind blowing. 
>>> That's taking aside your own exciting MM0 work. And I only have that much 
>>> time to learn about lots of things. I'm torn already :(
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Metamath" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/dc7550eb-9c0b-4953-93b5-1c9640b0ffd9n%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/dc7550eb-9c0b-4953-93b5-1c9640b0ffd9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Metamath" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CADBEgNPr7K5F10F0A8OVjk%2BFvdaZL6w5Q4o5KzTZB%2B4oaVaCOQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CADBEgNPr7K5F10F0A8OVjk%2BFvdaZL6w5Q4o5KzTZB%2B4oaVaCOQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/a2ed06af-9ff7-44a8-9f6d-db1ba9921ff1n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to