So is it specified somewhere that the header of each hierarchy of sections has two specific repeating patterns around the section name?
在2021年3月21日星期日 UTC+1 下午3:55:26<Alexander van der Vekens> 写道： > The conventions are fine for me (they can/should be added to the > ~conventions if nobody objects) , and I had only a small merge conflict ;-). > Alexander > > On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 11:57:25 AM UTC+1 Benoit wrote: > >> I was aiming for consistency with what seemed most common, maybe a bit >> too obsessively ! I hope this did not create merge conflicts with your >> recent PR. >> >> Whatever is decied, I can add it to ~conventions. >> >> Benoît >> >> On Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 10:21:26 AM UTC+1 Alexander van der Vekens >> wrote: >> >>> Recently, Benoît performed some reformattings of the section headers in >>> set.mm. It seems that there are the following (hidden) conventions: >>> >>> * two empty lines before a section header (after a theorem) >>> * indentation of the section header comment by two spaces >>> >>> If these are/shall become official conventions, they should be >>> documented in section "Conventions" (which does not, by the way, obey the >>> second rule). >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/e8c4797c-9a48-4dbf-a3b1-cad2aa18f770n%40googlegroups.com.
