The definition or the |`t operator is topology agnostic, but all comments 
refer to it as the subspace topology operator.

I need a subspace operator for sigma-algebras and |`t is just perfect (I've 
already used it for a number of not published theorems)

Furthermore, it looks like it would be perfect to define subspaces for 
other "structures" of sets (where difference, union and intersection are 
the only "operators" taken into account)

For instance, algebras of sets, semialgebras of sets, rings of sets and 
semirings of sets are good candidates: I've not investigated these 
additional "structures", but it looks like |`t would construct subspaces 
(please, don't quote me on this, I've not written definitions/theorems to 
be sure about it).

So, my question is, how should I proceed? (please, consider that this is a 
KEY concept in order to define partially defined measurable functions, 
that's at the core of [Fremlin1] development of integration)

I'm happily going on with |`t in my definition of subspace sigma-algebra: 
of course, I'm a bit concerned, because throughout all set.mm , COMMENTS 
refer to |`t as being related to topologies.

I'm using comments like the following:
The underlying set of a subspace induced by the ` |``t ` operator. The 
result can be applied, for instance, to topologies and sigma-algebras.

Here's an example of restuni5, a theorem (not published, yet) that 
generalizes restuni (restuni5 is "structure" agnostic)

    restuni.1 $e |- X = U. J $.
    restuni $p |- ( ( J e. Top /\ A C_ X ) -> A = U. ( J |`t A ) ) $=

    restuni5.1 $e |- X = U. J $.
    restuni5 $p |- ( ( J e. V /\ A C_ X ) -> A = U. ( J |`t A ) ) $=


Please, let me know how I should proceed: should I keep using |`t for 
sigma-algebras too?


Thanks in advance
Glauco

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/9cb56fe2-1b8e-4f27-b47d-057941fd085cn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to