Did I really write it? :-)

It looks like I wrote it when I was proving the Stone Weierstrass theorem, 
and that's been my first theorem in mm.

Back then, the whole framework was new to me, and I guess that the (sad) 
simple explanation is that I didn't know I was just one a1i away from ovex.

Thanks for the post, added to the refactor/cleanup mathbox to-do list.


Glauco

Il giorno giovedì 22 aprile 2021 alle 04:15:04 UTC+2 [email protected] ha 
scritto:

> It is a bit of a strange theorem. I see that it is in Glauco's mathbox 
> (and referenced a few times), and both the proof and the uses can be 
> simplified using ovex, but perhaps there is something that they were trying 
> to avoid (not axioms, the axiom list is a strict subset with the new 
> proof). Perhaps they can chime in here.
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 9:48 PM Jim Kingdon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 4/21/21 5:37 PM, Kyle Wyonch wrote:
>>
>> > I was wondering if this shortening [of cnfex] was valid
>>
>> Short answer is, yes it is valid.
>>
>> The longer answer is that set.mm defines a function evaluated outside 
>> its domain to be the empty set which is why 
>> http://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/fvex.html does not have any conditions.
>>
>> By contrast, iset.mm does not have the ability to do quite this, so 
>> instead cnfex would need to use 
>> http://us.metamath.org/ileuni/funfvex.html or one of the other 
>> alternatives under fvex at http://us.metamath.org/ileuni/mmil.html#setmm
>>
>> There is some discussion of this in the "undefined results" section of 
>> http://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/conventions.html and 
>> http://us.metamath.org/ileuni/conventions.html
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Metamath" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/c36661f8-ac06-7264-2dd8-d95a1cb1b41f%40panix.com
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/c54f5b85-7cc1-4395-8ee6-160063a1287dn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to