I endorse the suggestion to automatically check  if the submitted set.mm 
has the "recommended" format before a PR is accepted. It increase quality 
and avoids unnecessary discusions/merge conflicts. For a beginner it may be 
some extra effort, but she/he will learn it quickly, and then gain profit 
of the quality.

On Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 9:10:53 PM UTC+1 Glauco wrote:

> In the conversation for this pull request
>
> https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/pull/2285
>
> there's been some discussion about adding a GitHub Action to check if the 
> submitted set.mm has the "recommended" format.
>
>
> "Formatting recommendation prior to submitting a pull request" is 
> described here
>
> https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md
>
> The page also contains a one line bash command that should be run in order 
> to apply the recommended format. Here it is:
>
> ./metamath 'read set.mm' 'write source set.mm /rewrap' erase 'read set.mm' 
> 'save proof */compressed/fast' 'verify markup */file_skip/top_date_skip' 
> 'verify proof *' 'write source set.mm' quit
>
>
> We are inclined to add a job that checks that this command was actually 
> launched, before the PR. Here's an example of what is now happening 
> (without the mandatory constraint):
> - I do a PR where I add a couple hundred theorems and I forget to run the 
> command above
> - today, the PR can be merged, and it is merged (sometimes, "somebody" 
> notices it was not properly formatted, and I am required to fix and commit; 
> but not in this example)
> - later on, another contributor applies a few changes to set.mm and then, 
> as recommended, runs the above command, to get the standard formatting
> - then she diffs with remote, and she gets a huge number of lines changed 
> (those from my previous PR)
>
>
> Cons: this post
> https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/metamath/c/1tDhd-VkYNE/m/Vrctk_fqAQAJ
> is titled "Contributing is difficult." and I agree :-)
> And maybe this would make it even more difficult.
>
> My opinion is that the reformatting back and forth we are exposed today, 
> should be prevented.
>
> Any comment?
>
>
> BR
> Glauco
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/71e88ad1-0ff3-489f-8d69-04bd94f99d5an%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to