>
> For example, the first line is (["fvex","eqeltri"],791). By
> reverse-engineering the associated statement in mmj2 we get a reasonable
> theorem
>
> ${
> test1.1 $e |- A = ( F ` B ) $.
> test1 $p |- A e. _V $=
> ( cfv cvv fvex eqeltri ) ABCEFDBCGH $.
> $}
>
That's great, but I do not really know how to get this theorem (including
its proof) from the sequence ["fvex","eqeltri"]. How does the
reverse-engineering work in mmj2?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/04d113a9-7879-48c3-a56c-afd7dbc5d25dn%40googlegroups.com.
