I think that if it's only going to appear once or a few times, I would
rather have it as a $j comment than a markup keyword, since the latter is
more likely to not be recognized as a keyword. (I am generally opposed to
markup keywords altogether - I would rather have computer-readable keywords
be explicitly called out as such and presentation tools should incorporate
this in the e.g. HTML display if desired.) $j commands are also fairly low
cost since they do not mandate the existence of any tool that recognizes
them (there are a couple $j commands that are already in that category) -
the only thing that is needed is to make up a keyword and write it in the
file, and tools can decide to honor the annotation if they want to.

On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 1:12 PM Benoit <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think it's overkill for something that basically never happens.  Are
> there cases in set.mm apart from a1ii (which is said to be useful for use
> in some proof assistants, but I don't even know if it's ever used) and
> bj-df-clel, bj-df-cleq (which are candidates to replace df-clel, df-cleq,
> in which case they will become $a-statements anyway) ?
> BenoƮt
>
> On Sunday, July 17, 2022 at 7:01:18 PM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> I also wonder whether this would be better expressed as a $j comment
>> rather than another plain text comment in the doc string. It's not really
>> important user-facing information.
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:57 PM 'Alexander van der Vekens' via Metamath <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, July 17, 2022 at 6:36:13 PM UTC+2 David A. Wheeler wrote:
>>>
>>>> I propose using these comment markings for assertions ($a and $p) where
>>>> hypotheses
>>>> are not used on *purpose*:
>>>> * "(Intentionally unused hypothesis)" if exactly one hypothesis is
>>>> unused
>>>> * "(Intentionally unused hypotheses)" if more than one hypotheses are
>>>> unused
>>>>
>>>> I was originally going to propose both simply because that's how
>>>> English plurals work.
>>>> However, there's an error-detect advantage to making their meaning
>>>> different -
>>>> if you only intended 1 hypothesis to be unused, but more than one is,
>>>> it
>>>> can still be caught.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is a good idea, especially if there is a tool/script which checks
>>> automatically if there are (unintentionally) unused hypotheses. But from
>>> this tool perspective, I would suggest to have only one marking:
>>>
>>> * "(Intentionally unused hypotheses)" if at least one hypothesis is
>>> unused
>>>
>>> It is the responsibility of the contributor who uses such a marking that
>>> the hypotheses are as intended - the tool/script can check all other cases,
>>> which will be the vast majority.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Metamath" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/d1f0a889-7d14-4e56-95d9-acef10ba8102n%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/d1f0a889-7d14-4e56-95d9-acef10ba8102n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Metamath" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/3c546ae4-c8da-4bc0-96d5-9727b9039690n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/3c546ae4-c8da-4bc0-96d5-9727b9039690n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAFXXJSvcVev6%3DwKe%3Dt78OGm-Ow3ug%2BV5e6Jfg%2B3_biEShDcBMw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to