A proof for 3cubes is ready 
- 
https://github.com/expln/metamath-theorems/blob/master/metamath-christmas-challenge-2023/metamath-christmas-challenge-2023.mm
 

-
Igor

On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 4:59:54 PM UTC+1 savask wrote:

> Thierry,
>
> > Maybe I'll have another go at implementing the tactics directly in an 
> (existing) programming language rather than designing a scripting language, 
> and see where this leads me. I'd probably use metamath-knife as a basis for 
> that. 
>
> You are definitely exploring new ground here. As far as I understand, most 
> proof systems (like Lean) use one language for proofs and tactics, so they 
> don't have to think about these kinds of problems. I can see how a 
> universal tactic language can be useful though, for one, if it's simple 
> enough, every independent proof assistant could implement some core and 
> immediately get access to all already written tactics for metamath.
>
> Igor,
>
> > I was able to prove 3cubeslem1, 3cubeslem2 and a bit of 3cubeslem3 in 
> “manual” mode using current capabilities of mm-lamp (I can share proofs if 
> needed).
>
> Looks like you're close to proving 3cubes indeed!
>
> > ... But it starts feeling like a not proper use of time doing such 
> proofs manually. So, I am going to start working on adding some automation 
> capabilities to mm-lamp.
>
> Funny enough, I had a similar experience with metamath. My contribution 
> was very small, but I was surprised how tiring it was to do the most 
> mundane of things, so I thought I would try to make a proof assistant with 
> automation myself. Long story short, turns out making a proof assistant is 
> way harder than making a verifier, so I gave up :-) It would be amazing if 
> some tool, like metamath-lamp, would have basic automation allowing one to 
> prove statements like 3cubeslem3 with ease.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/8a6224c7-2db0-4a5b-9c37-a1dd7601cac6n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to