Yes, we have a definition for (effectively) “not free” (see https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/df-nf.html and (especially note 3) of https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/mmset.html#distinct) so one could negate this definition and get “free”. In practice for metamath, substitution is by default allowed, so “not free” becomes the proven thing. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a use for the negation of not free, and I’ve tried. On Jan 14, 2025, at 10:01 AM, Sylvain Kerjean <[email protected]> wrote: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/29EEDEFE-EDE6-4FCD-A111-244A94ED5B6D%40gmail.com. |
- [Metamath] LAMP axiom/definition Sylvain Kerjean
- Re: [Metamath] LAMP axiom/definition 'David A. Wheeler' via Metamath
- Re: [Metamath] LAMP axiom/definit... Igor Ieskov
- Re: [Metamath] LAMP axiom/definit... Sylvain Kerjean
- Re: [Metamath] LAMP axiom/def... Steven Nguyen
