Let me try to get this one right the first time.

This doesn't address the Lunar meteorite vs Ejecta debate  but is a 
discussion on how volcanic glass-specifically "Apache Tears" forms. See 
the previous discussion on tektite and impact glass for comparison.

First  some terms:
Felsic- Light-colored low temperature rock/mineral from the bottom of 
Bowen's Reaction Series (BRS) These are the last minerals to form from a 
magmatic source as the temperature drops towards 800°C e.g. muscovite, 
quartz. The rocks obsidian and scoria are the exceptions to the light 
colored felsic rocks.

Malfic- Dark-colored high temperature rock/minerals from the top of the 
BRS, These are the top end which start to solidify below 1400°C e.g. 
olivine, pyroxene, plagioclase.

Intermediate- middle range rock/mineral having characteristics of both 
malfic and felsic e.g. orthoclase, biotite.

 Scoria/Pumice/Tuft/Ash- all pyroclastic (extrusive volcanic) rocks 
which are compositionally the same which have subtle 
texture/structure/cooling differences which grade into each other.   
They are often used interchangably in general discussion but are 
distinct technically.

Bowen's Reaction Series (BRS)- A predictable, idealized model of magma 
evolution first developed around 100 years ago( important in the study 
of meteorites!*).  It describes a succession of mineral combinations 
which occur as a melt cools to solid; forming mineral/crystals given a 
sufficiently slow cooling period. It is frequently depicted on a "Y" 
shaped diagram.   Key to the understanding of BRS as it relates here is 
1) the higher temperature minerals get "first dibs" on compatible 
elements and compounds and leave the party in a pecking order such that 
the last in line is Silica/quartz. 2) If the temperature doesn't get 
high enough, the high (melting) temperature compounds don't even come to 
the party and Silica Rules!

Apache Tears as common term for nodular obsidian.

The bulk content of the rock obsidian is silica, silicon dioxide-- SiO 2 
which is a light colored, "felsic" mixture.  Notice I did not say 
"mineral".  It is the relatively-fast cooling which forms glass, without 
allowing a crystalline structure to form nor, for other mineral-forming 
compounds to segregate to form a mineral--a subtle but technical point. 
The trace material's found in obsidian are from the "felsic to 
intermediate" BRS "pre- mineral compounds/ molecules". Bulk obsidian 
composition will be from the bottom (felsic) end of the BRS. and one 
would think it would be light in color. Obsidian is dark because, while 
it is a glass, it has many impurities which absorb light and make it 
appear dark.

Apache tears are frequently found in stream beds were they have eroded 
from a softer "felsic" pumice/scoria-ash in which they form. So they may 
on first observation look as it they were spewed from a volcano high 
into the air.  They are not ejected in the form they are found. They 
form after hot ash accumulates.  The ash retains enough heat to allow 
low end BRS actions to occur,  while too cool for anything above molten 
Silica and volcanic gasses to migrate.  It is hot enough but barely long 
enough for those two things to happen.  Molecules actually remelt and 
droplets of silica glass accrete into developing gas pockets.  This 
allows most gas to escape from within the glass as it pools  and grows 
in non-crystaline fashion. Obsidian has a relatively high water content, 
interestingly enough . The "tear" is more dense than the scoria/pumice/ 
tuft which is still highly gaseous. So it settles by this  short-lived 
sorting action in bands within the ash. If the mass remained hotter 
longer the obsidian would consolidate into veins of obsidian towards the 
bottom of the ash layer. If you crushed the scoria to eliminate the gas 
pockets the obsidian would float to the top, but because of the gas 
content scoria- specifically pumice will float on water.

 Apache Tears, therefore  are a post-ejection form of obsidian which 
form rapidly and cease growing into larger veins of obsidian because the 
temperature of the scoria/ pumice ash falls below the threshold of the 
mineral formation in the lower end of Bowen's reaction series.  When one 
looks at ash containing Apache Tears under a microscope tiny droplets of 
obsidian may be seen. Change any of the variables such as hotter ash, 
longer cooling times, or more malfic content and other wonderful things 
happen like augite crystals and muscovite in scoria from Vesuvius or in 
one case topaz crystals from ash deposits in Utah.  Apache tears can 
only form when the conditions are just right as Goldie Locks might 
say....not too hot,  not too long, not too much ash accumulation to keep 
all that heat in --just right!.

Now if we only understood so well or could duplicate the conditions 
under which tektites formed! One thing is for certain.  Apache Tears, 
while glass, do not share a common history with mainstream tektites.

Regards,
Elton

* BRS:  Interpreting the composition and size of crystals in Achondrites 
disclose the temperature, size, and composition history of the 
Achondrite parent body.  Interpreting the coarseness or fineness of 
Irons also disclose the history and size of the Iron's parent body.  The 
matrix of common chondrites is malfic; being the olivine, bronzite, 
hyperstene and amphibole discontinuous branch of the BRS.



thornysahuaro wrote:

>Greetings all,  
>Would any of you please explain the differences between Tektites and
>Apache Tears. Apache Tears are rounded bits of smokey grey obsidian
>(volcanic glass) found all over the Southwest US. They have a dull black
>surface and often have perfect regmaglypts when found. To me this would
>indicate that they were ejected quite high before they fell.  When
>polished they range from nearly opaque black to a nearly clear light gray
>color.  Some have lines or swirls of darker glass that can be seen if held
>up to a light.
>Thanks,
>




______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to