Adam wrote: "If you want a piece of a recycled old Ford motor block in your 
collection, that is your business."
 
Not to be too anal, but wouldn't something like "Karkhov Russian tractor block" 
be more accurate? ;)
 
Cheers,
Pete
 



> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:38:17 -0700
> From: raremeteori...@yahoo.com
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Shirokovsky
> 
> I guess collecting artifacts has made me leery about fakes. Get caught with 
> one fake artifact and it will put your entire collection in question. It is 
> best to get artifacts papered and destroy any that have been "killed" by an 
> independent authenticator. I see Shirokovsky as being off topic since it is 
> not a meteorite and is was only produced in order to defraud honest 
> collectors out of their hard earned money. 
> 
> If you want a piece of a recycled old Ford motor block in your collection, 
> that is your business. To me, it is garbage and so are the people who 
> produced it!
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bernd V. Pauli <bernd.pa...@paulinet.de>
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Cc: 
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 1:50 PM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Shirokovsky
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> Shirokovsky is terrestrial, it is a pseudo-meteorite, it is man-made!
> 
> - does not contain typical accessory phases of stony-iron meteorites
> - accessory phases completely atypical
> - Olivine has a terrestrial oxygen isotopic composition
> - Pt/Ir ratio similar to that of terrestrial Cu-Ni ore deposits
> - has never been in space (noble gases no cosmic component!)
> - absence of cosmic-ray tracks corroborates noble gas study results (= 
> bestätigen)
> - Olivine TL spectra similar to terrestrial peridotites
> 
> Conclusion: Shirokovsky is manufactured, man-made!
> 
> As for its nickel contents, see also the entry in the (online) Met.Bull.
> 
> ... and, yes, I have a thin 2.7 gr slice of Shirokovsky with translucent 
> olivines.
> I got that pseudo-pallasite in 2003 from Eric Olson. It doesn't pollute my
> collection but it sure looks a bit "pale-faced" when sitting next to a genuine
> pallasite like Esquel, Brenham, Admire, etc.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bernd
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> 
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list                       
>                   
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to