And of course these days there are no scoundrels about in the meteorite world at all ;-)
Graham On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Martin Goff <msgmeteori...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Doug, > > He was certainly not all starchy white in reputation and was > definitely a bit of scoundrel at times, in a very British way of > course. > > You wrote > > "Anyways, he was definitely one of the most colorful characters of > early meteorite enlightenment, and as a publicist actuallydeserves in > my opinion even more credit than he gets" > > You also wrote > > "Wonder what Prof. Pillinger thinks of this?" > > Well, i know that Professor Pillinger is currently researching a book > all about Edward Topham so we will have to wait and see what his > conclusions are! :-) > > > Cheers > > Martin > > On 10 February 2012 11:22, MexicoDoug <mexicod...@aim.com> wrote: >> "Edward Topham was not a Sir" >> >> Hi Martin, >> >> Thanks for the kind reply; Someone else also said he was a Sir, I'm trying >> to remember. Maybe there really is more to the story. But, even if he were >> to have been knighted, wasn't George a bit too mad by that time, or are >> there others who have that power I wonder... >> >> Topham didn't even earn his title of "Major", he was just a captain, and >> upon retirement I think the policy was just to bump Captains up to Majors so >> they got bigger pensions. The newspaper he founded, as far as I can tell, >> was the very first widely circulated tabloid newspaper in the world >> (coincidently named 'The Globe'). However, he got into all kinds of legal >> troubles just before the meteorite fell and had to close it down, since he >> apparently has offended a well-respected recently dead man. If I recall, he >> pulled through the episode by the skin of his teeth and set some common law >> presicents in England saying a dead man's estate can't sue for libel. >> >> While he may have been respected in certain circles, I think he just sponged >> off Mrs. Wells during fair weather, made a business out of her with benefits >> (after this blew over she became a nun) and then as her superstar status >> began to wane, let her rot in jail and took her children away from her for >> himself. I'm sure it was a bit more complicated than that (she had a >> brother or brother in law who was a scoundrel), but still, IMO he was just a >> fancy-pants socialite. I really don't mean to offend since we like to give >> as much respect as we can to those great men and women in the history of >> meteorites, but the respect he got was probably more like a straight Perez >> Hilton of today (and many people live for that stuff in the USA!). So I >> think it is worthwhile mentioning. >> >> When you think about the circumstances of the exhibition of the meteorite, >> it sort of fits together in my opinion, but I'm sure there are alternate >> interpretations out there that make him a hero instead of one of the King's >> yes-men ;-) >> >> Anyways, he was definitely one of the most colorful characters of early >> meteorite enlightenment, and as a publicist actuallydeserves in my opinion >> even more credit than he gets. Wonder what Prof. Pillinger thinks of this? >> >> Kindest wsihes >> Doug > > > > -- > Martin Goff > www.msg-meteorites.co.uk > IMCA #3387 > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list