Jason (and list), My "comment" was actually a question, and that question was with regards to the fact than any work done on an unapproved meteorite cannot be published by LPSC or MetSoc, so why not get it approved first, then commence with the tests, paper writings, and publications? What merit do the test results have if they cannot be published? It was an honest question born of ignorance of the process.
Michael in so. Cal. >On May 1, 2013 11:50 AM, "Jason Utas" <meteorite...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 6) Michael Mulgrew's recent comment makes no sense to me. Every > meteorite must be studied to some extent prior to publication, or it > could not be published. ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
