Elton, 
As always you make some very good points. 
I agree that this is a glassy slag. But, the question is; Where did it come 
from? 
Did the MIR have any glass that could have melted upon re-entry? 
And who at NASA said it came from MIR? To me those are the critical questions 
because if for example A fellow at NASA named  Grossman or Korotev said it I 
would tend to believe them. No need for pigeon holing material because it 
"looks" like slag. I know this is a stretch but, Some meteorites do look like 
slag. Look close at a hand specimen ( not a photo) of Vaca Muerta . 
Carl
meteoritemax

--
Cheers

---- MEM <mstrema...@yahoo.com> wrote: 
> 
> 
> I don't know which is a sadder example of failed science education: some 
> "NASA" "water cooler" engineer issuing a positive ID/letter of authenticity 
> for something impossible and under the color of authority of NASA--(Another 
> waste-fraud and abuse complaint to be made) OR the entire met central 
> membership and not one poster can recognize silicate ==> slag <===on sight.  
> ( I am not saying that "everyone" should be a slag expert just that there 
> should be more experts with critical vs casual identification skills given 
> all the talent represented here.) 
> 
> A bit more than a few would-be meteorite experts need to spend an extra 3 
> hours of field time getting to know ==> slag <== because I can't think of a 
> location in the lower 48, nor in all of Europe that would be farther than 3 
> hours max from a graveled path or railroad that doesn't have tons of it on 
> the surface.  ( I've found slag in Alaska but not in Hawaii where natural 
> slag is known as pahoe-pahoe)
> 
> I was explaining the multitude of reasons that slag is found virtually 
> everywhere--including Revolutionary and Civil War foundries, long left 
> abandoned to rural pastures when I had someone once argue that his specimen 
> couldn't be slag from a rail road because there had never been a railroad 
> within miles.  I then showed him on the topo map where an abandoned rail 
> right-of-way was less than 200 yards from the dirt road he found his 
> "meteor-wrong" along.  
> 
> Ever since the industrial revolution, the smelting industry has been finding 
> every possible way to get rid of it. I know of whole islands and whole 
> mountains of slag. Green glassy foamy slag is the most common owing to the 
> buoyancy of silicated minerals rising to the top of the mix in any ore 
> smelting. Depending on the pre-processing inefficiency, there can be lots 
> more slag than metal on each run--hence the need to farm the stuff off on 
> others being thankful they had a use for it!  Ballast for road beds, dumping 
> it off shore( See The Great Lake Emerald Meteorite saga) or using it for 
> shoreline erosion control or using it as gravel for paving are just a few.  
> It is literally everywhere.  
> 
> 
> It just takes some experience and exposure to become a slag expert.  I know 
> first hand after sending some charcoal bearing volcanic glass to the 
> Smithsonian for radio-carbon dating a hither-to-unknown volcano from middle 
> Tennessee.  Mr Harold Banks returned the sample with a nice letter telling 
> that 12 year old that his slag wasn't suitable for dating.  I later found 
> that I had pulled it from a Civil War Cannonball foundry.  Point: slag is 
> everywhere even if the original source is long gone. The slag last forever 
> for human understanding, even across cultures and ages.  There are 
> pre-historic slag piles on Cyprus, Italy, Greece, Egypt etc.  It is a fallacy 
> of logic to believe that something "can't be slag" because you don't know 
> exactly how it came to be in a location. Seems that to believe it therefore 
> "came from space" seems to be the corollary which always follows.
> 
> The most frequent meteor-wrong brought in for identification, we should all 
> get to know it by characteristic and by sight so that the kinds of 
> disruptions we see every few weeks by the novice insisting that it couldn't 
> be slag and must be a meteorite could be simply answered in the FAQ section.
> 
> Regards,
> Elton
> 
> ______________________________________________
> 
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to