Peter Davidson <p.david...@nms.ac.uk> wrote:
My concern is that, having given a negative answer (and they almost without
question are) to an enquiry about a possible meteorite, I (or any
curator/collector) become the subject of a vicious trolling campaign and find
that our professional (and sometime personal) reputation is brought into
question for no other reason than we gave the "wrong" answer.
I have a similar experience, unfortunately.
This is not restricted to meteorites by the way. I am a stone age archaeologists
and quite often when I tell people that their fractured rock is not a handaxe
(and in fact not even an artefact) the response is to question my expertise.
Part of the problem is that people tend to believe their own often inadequate
internet "research" over the opinion of experts, and that there is a wider
tendency nowadays to distrust scientists (and praise charlatans simply for their
contrarian opinions). You see the same phenomena with regard to vaccines, GMO,
global warming, etcetera. It's a wider cultural problem that I think has little
to do with social media (even if these do play a role in it: but I don't think
they are the source of it, merely a vehicle). It rides along with the increasing
shallowness of discourse in our western society and the increasing indifference
to expertise and devaluation of science. People start to confuse opinions with
fact-based assessments.
- Marco
-----
Dr Marco (asteroid 183294) Langbroek
Dutch Meteor Society (DMS)
e-mail: d...@marcolangbroek.nl
http://www.dmsweb.org
http://www.marcolangbroek.nl
-----
______________________________________________
Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
