You want disrespectful, Glyn-who-can't-even-set-up-his-own-email-account? Try this on for size: Fuck off.
Michael in so. Cal. On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Ann Cain via Meteorite-list <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote: > John A. Shea, > > > That email was sent to me privately and I responded privately and only to > those members that Jason Utas originally sent it to. I gave Jason Utas the > right to go public and debate the meteoritic topics/ issues only if he wanted > to do so. > > What you did was very disrespectful. > > > > Sincerely, > > > Glyn Howard > > (Yes, I use the account my sister Ann Cain set-up here on the Meteorite List > for me. We share the account.) > > > > > Sent from Outlook > > > > > > > From: Meteorite-list <meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com> on behalf > of Bigjohn Shea via Meteorite-list <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> > Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2016 5:43 PM > To: Art Jones; metlist > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] WR Gallery Delay – U.S. World Record Mars > Meteorite Discovery > > To the Metlist Admin(s), > > With respect, why are these people (Ann Cain, Glyn Howard) not blocked from > the metlist yet? > > This is clearly a scam, or the work of foolish people who refuse to listen to > reason. Either way, we should not all be forced to receive their emails for > years on end when they are clearly not representing an actual interest of any > kind in meteoritics. > > In order to protect the integrity of the Metlist as a valuable resource to > the meteorite community, I respectfully request that you remove any emails > associated with Ann Cain and Glyn Howard from the metlist. > > Sincerely, > John A. Shea MD > IMCA 3295 > > > > Sent using the mail.com mail app > > On 7/30/16 at 4:24 PM, Ann Cain wrote: > >> Jason, >> >> >> I haven't checked this email account in many months. It's now summer time >> and I have time to respond respectfully and I will do so. >> >> >> Why not discuss this in public openly? Post your original email to me on the >> Meteorite List and I will address all your concerns one by one openly and >> publicly, and we will debate it. >> >> >> I can say you are wrong and I can prove it. >> >> >> >> I haven't embarrassed anyone. I've been very respectful. I have a right to >> disagree, as do you, and to provide the evidence. >> >> >> >> You do not know the background history of this discovery. You do not know >> the several very well known (famous even) meteoriticists involved, who also >> know the truth. As well, a very well known (famous) thin-section technician >> who knows and does brilliant work. Anne knows him very well. The thin >> section technician wants to stay out of the fray, he's done nothing wrong >> and has been very honorable and very professional the entire time working >> with me. I would like to continue using his very professional services. >> He's a great guy. Professional. Straight up. >> >> >> But you should also know Scientists are human and have human feelings, and >> failings, and competition and professional jealousy can and does occur in >> science. I provided a link in the Meteorite List discussion for such a study >> that validates that it does indeed happen at times in science. >> >> >> We are talking about a few scientists in the meteoritics world, not more. >> They know who they are. I know them and they know me. I know what happened >> when we met, I know what they did. I have all the emails for our >> communications. I can instantly prove they misrepresented the truth and did >> so purposefully. It's called "stone-walling" among other things. When I told >> them I wouldn't tell them the discovery site until contracts "with the >> powers that be" were agreed to, then all kinds of purposeful misinformation >> and misrepresentation on their part occurred towards me. That is unethical >> and unprofessional behavior. I already knew they were meteorites before >> coming to them for their services. I already knew they were achondrites. I >> did not know how to prove the Parent Body at the time. But I can do all of >> that now. Now I have that knowledge. It is not my intention to embarrass >> anyone publicly. I want them to admit their unprofessional behavior >> privately to me and admit their mistakes. The matter between us will be over >> without the community ever knowing the embarrassing history or their >> identity. I'm a forgiving person. >> >> >> By the way, I worked with many geologists, analysts, and a very well known >> private petrology whole rock analysis company with a science research >> department with a long experience in meteorite analysis, all who didn't play >> any unethical games or act unprofessionally that helped and guided me at >> key moments in my study. To them I'm very grateful and in time they will get >> their due credit when the story can go completely public. >> >> >> The discovery is what it is. You are wrong. I can prove it. Let's debate it >> publicly and openly. >> >> >> There are many people who have contacted me privately that know the evidence >> is true and real. My website is basic and simple, not spectacular, but it >> fits my needs. I'm receiving traffic from all over the world and many images >> and articles are being copied and saved. >> >> >> It wasn't a coincidence that when I went to the ACLU for support for my >> discovery that "TPTB" changed the collecting laws "out of the blue" within >> one month of that detailed email that I sent to the ACLU describing my >> discovery and reaching out to them for their legal support. The original >> PhD meteorite analysts who work at well known Universities that I went to >> for help, also do government contracts. They know I know what I have. I know >> they know what I have. People talk. There are no coincidences in this case. >> One of these analysts even offered to have another look at the GSA and GSB >> specimens knowing I now knew full well what they are and I could now prove >> it and prove the PB. I said "No." He had his chance. >> >> >> Its my discovery. I can do the initial analysis and do the initial >> classification, and I have. Another team of analysts can reconfirm. That's >> how science works. I'm not giving away my original and first credit for my >> discovery, analysis, and classification. Another meteoritics science team >> can reconfirm and they will in time. >> >> >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> >> >> Glyn Howard >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: jason utas <jasonu...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 7:11 PM >> To: Ann Cain; Art Jones; Impactika; Galactic Stone; Michael Mulgrew; Bigjohn >> Shea >> Subject: WR Gallery Delay – U.S. World Record Mars Meteorite Discovery >> >> Glyn, >> You have derided a number of fairly educated and experienced list-members. >> As a studying cosmochemistry PhD with about two decades' worth of experience >> in meteorites, I will list some facts plainly. >> >> I have looked over the evidence you offer on your websites. >> >> You note "undulose extinction in quartz" as evidence that your samples have >> been shocked. But undulatory extinction is common in terrestrial quartz -- >> and not due to shock. See >> here<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undulose_extinction> and >> here<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpTENXNj8es>. Note that this is a very >> common attribute of quartz; most rocks contain some quartz that exhibits >> undulatory extinction in XPL. Anyone who had picked up a book on petrology >> would have seen this covered in the first or second chapter. >> >> Your samples don't appear to show any evidence of undulatory extinction in >> olivine, as would be needed to place your rocks on this >> diagram<http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/ImpactShockMetTables2.jpg>. The fact >> that you have ignored the text stating that the observed undulatory >> extinction must be in olivine is telling; whoever called your rock "S3" had >> no idea what they were doing. Olivine and quartz don't show similar shock >> features at similar pressures. They are different minerals with different >> basic physical properties. >> >> The "planar deformation features" you have noted in quartz appear to be >> indigenous crystallographic features that do not completely transect any >> grains. This<http://minerals.cr.usgs.gov/gips/images/colormed.gif> is what >> shocked quartz looks like. Note the vibrant mosaicism due to physical >> strain stored within the grain. This is conceptually similar to the optical >> distortion you can observe in Prince Rupert's >> Drops<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Rupert%27s_Drop> in polarized >> light. The linked image of shocked quartz also shows abundant obvious >> parallel lines as a result of shock (also, see >> here<http://www.sail2ak.com/ray/classes/sem/final_project.html>). There >> are no such features in anything on your website. >> This<http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/GSAXPL40XEnlPDFs2.jpg> (and >> this<http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/GSB2XPL100XPlanFracPFs1.jpg>) is not >> shocked quartz, and the "undulose extinction" you show on your website is >> typical terrestrial metamorphism. We can refer back to the >> video<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpTENXNj8es> I linked to above, >> showing XPL undulatory extinction of quartz in granite. Also note the faint >> crystallographically oriented lines partially crossing several of the grains >> in the video. That's not shocked quartz. Those are regular crystal >> features that you would find in nearly every quartz grain on Earth. >> >> This<http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/ThinSectGSB2EviArt6.jpg> isn't amphibole. >> It's >> calcite<http://www.geo.arizona.edu/geo3xx/geo306_mdbarton/classonly/306%20Web%20Materials/306_Lecture041122_files/image084.gif>. >> Which reflects metamorphism or hydrothermal alteration. Again, a common >> feature you would see in an ordinary terrestrial rock. >> >> Your depictions of "toasting" and "decorative PDFs" are likewise >> misconstrued. >> >> This image<http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/GSAXPL100XDecorPDFs2.jpg> most >> likely shows a dusty plagioclase grain with twinning that you mistakenly >> label as a "PDF in quartz." Note the complete lack of linear features >> throughout the grain -- except for the one lighter band you mark >> here<http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/GSAXPL100XDecorPDFs1.jpg>. That band is >> far too wide to be a typical PDF, and is instead a normal twinning plane, >> probably in plagioclase (not quartz). Since the two exhibit similar levels >> of birefringence, they are often mixed up by petrology students. >> >> There is no "toasting" in this >> image<http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/GSAXPL40XShMeltToast1.jpg>. Those are >> normal dirty, fractured mineral grains that you would find in ~any >> metamorphic rock, most sedimentary rocks, and many igneous rocks. The >> "shock melt veins" pictured contain abundant light and green mineral grains, >> so they cannot be quenched shock-melt or glass, which would be isotropic >> (uniformly black in XPL). They appear to be minerals deposited along >> simple fractures during metamorphism, like epidote, etc. Very common in >> terrestrial rocks. >> >> You place your rocks on a diagram of igneous Martian rocks, but they would >> fit just as well on a normal terrestrial diagram: >> here<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Petrology_Igneous.jpg>. >> You also mention that you used the "Michel-Levy Method" to determine your >> rock's bulk FeO/MnO ratios. The Michel-Levy Method is used to determine >> (very roughly) the composition of plagioclase, based on its optical >> extinction. Nothing else. In other words, that claim / statement is >> nonsense. >> >> Your macroscopic evidence is no better. >> That<http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/GSBEviArt1.jpg> looks nothing like fusion >> crust. That rock is a typical water-worn pebble with some desert varnish. >> Take it from a geologist with almost two decades 'in meteorites.' >> >> I don't know where to begin on this >> image<http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/BikkurimEviArt3.jpg>. It looks like a >> normal terrestrial rock that has been weathered in a desert environment for >> an extended period of time. Nothing described in the caption is visible in >> the photo. The caption also seems to suggest that even relatively small >> meteorites experience "shock" when they reach the Earth's surface. This is >> one of several common misconceptions that people have regarding what >> transpires when meteorites hit the ground. >> >> I did not observe any evidence on your website that appeared to accurately >> suggest that your rocks were meteorites, shocked in any way, or from any >> body other than Earth. >> >> ---------- >> >> As Carl Sagan said, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." >> You have made extraordinary claims, but the evidence you have put forth does >> not corroborate them. Instead, it suggests that your rocks are typical >> ~igneous rocks from Earth. >> >> I can't stress this enough. The evidence you have put forth literally >> refutes the idea that your specimens are either shocked, or meteorites. The >> photos and thin section images suggest that you have found an area with >> ordinary, unshocked, generally silicic volcanic rocks. These rocks make up >> a substantial portion of Earth's surface. There is not one shred of >> evidence in everything you have written and/or posted that suggests that >> your rocks are shocked, or not from Earth. Or that they might be from Mars. >> On the contrary, the evidence suggests that you do not understand how to >> identify even common minerals in a polarizing microscope, and that you are >> not familiar with diagnostic shock features in minerals. Any geologist >> would say as much. Perhaps with more tact. >> >> John Cleese has a viral video circulating that makes an astute observation: >> for a person to understand what they do not know, they first need to begin >> to understand what they do know. The fact that you would attempt to >> identify minerals and rare mineral features without first working to obtain >> a basic understanding of birefringence, or how to discriminate between >> common minerals or mineral features in a microscope, speaks to this. Your >> website describes things that many people with college-level geology >> degrees never even see in labs. The problem is that you have never seen >> them, either. You do not have a good frame of reference. Based on the >> terms you have used on your website, some of which are unusual even in >> literature, it looks as though you have perused the photos on this >> website<http://www.impact-structures.com/shock-metamorphism-page/> and >> copied many of the written terms to describe features in your specimens that >> only crudely resemble their real counterparts. That's not how you do >> science. >> >> Most (all?) folks on the Meteorite-List would be ecstatic to hear of a new >> meteorite from Mars, the Moon, or anywhere else. They would be lining up to >> buy a piece. But your claims are not well founded, your rocks look nothing >> like meteorites, inside or out, and there's simply nothing to corroborate >> your extraordinary hypothesis. Instead of sending your specimens to a lab >> that analyses meteorites, you've taken some photos through a microscope and >> have made some incorrect interpretations of what is pictured. >> >> Amazingly enough (and this almost never happens), your photos are actually >> good enough for someone with a decent knowledge of geology/meteorites to >> rightly conclude that your rocks aren't shocked. Or meteorites. You have >> posted enough actual photographic and mineralogical evidence to >> conclusively show that your hypothesis is wrong. >> >> You also ridiculed various people on the list based on their apparent lack >> of academic credentials, over an extended period of time. A number of them >> have been familiar with meteorites for years, if not decades. Your >> insulting responses to their input is...ignorant. Especially in light of >> the fact that you have no credentials or experience of your own. In other >> words, they are still more qualified than you. You owe them an apology, and >> should respect their opinions. >> >> Please take a step back and reevaluate. >> >> I have cc'd most of the people who have written something of substance on >> this thread. We have spent enough of the list's time on this. Art - you >> might take action. >> >> Jason >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Ann Cain via Meteorite-list >> <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com<mailto:meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>> >> wrote: >> Anne Black, >> >> >> I would really be careful about making statements that just aren’t true and >> are meant to belittle. >> >> >> You sell meteorites. You deal meteorites. You provide a very good service >> for the world-wide meteorite community, but do you do the science of >> meteoritics? Do you know how to verify a meteorite? Can you classify a >> meteorite? Can you verify/prove the Parent Body for Achondrites? >> >> >> I can. You will be proven wrong. >> >> >> We’ve met. We talked for a while many years ago in Tucson. I was there in >> your temporary sales shop. The master technician who makes your high quality >> hand crafted double-polished meteorite thin-sections that you sell also made >> my thin-sections. He’s the best no doubt about it. I don’t want to see him >> stop his great craft. There’s not another like him. If it wasn’t for his >> brilliantly made thin-sections, I wouldn’t have made the US World Record >> Mars Meteorite Discovery I made. His work allowed me to prove it. This >> world class technician knows. He knows. >> >> >> All GSA and GSB Mars Meteorite thin-sections were made by this master >> technician. As a result, not only was I able to prove previously the >> megascopic on-site evidence in the field proving meteoritic origin, and the >> megascopic evidence proving, fusion crust, orientation, regmaglypts, >> drip-lines, melt accumulate etc., but due to these well-crafted hand >> polished thin-sections I was able to prove the microscopic evidence of >> impact shock metamorphism at the mineral grain level: undulose extinction, >> planar fractures, planar deformation features (PDFs), decorative PDFs, >> shock melt veins and pockets, mosaicism, Plagioclase ---> Maskelynite, and >> Quartz ---> Coesite ---> Stishovite, high bi-refrigence, thetomorphs ---> >> incipient vaporization ---> vesicles and round vesicles, impact shock melt >> (localized), impact shock imbedded grains or blebs of metals, Fe-oxides or >> Goethite, minerals, or globules from the original impactor, and micro impact >> shock effects within opaque Fe-oxide grains (which I’m in the process of >> studying and which seems to be an in-described phenomenon and very unique.) >> The identified shock stage for GSA is (S4) and GSB is (S5). All this proves >> they are meteorites. >> >> >> Also these high quality hand polished thin-sections have resulted in a new >> discovery in terms of impact-shock metamorphism effects on FeO grains within >> Mars meteorites at the microscopic level. When all is said and done, this >> new microscopic opaque FeO grain impact-shock metamorphism effect will have >> to be named after myself and this world class thin-section technician, and >> it should be called “ ___________ - _______ pattern.” I discovered these >> opaque standing in positive relief Ni enriched lamellae within the FeO >> grains only as a result of these high quality hand polished thin-sections. >> Without these well-made thin-sections I wouldn’t have been able to see these >> patterns. Once I discovered them, then I called and asked the thin section >> technician to look, and he found them too. This effect, this pattern in >> micro-grains of FeOs are not Widmanstatten pattern. They are not >> Martinization. This is a new Mars meteoritic effect/pattern due to >> impact-shock metamorphism within opaque grains of FeOs. >> >> http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/GSB3XPLPPinc400XNiEnrichLam1.jpg >> >> >> >> In addition, with these very high quality double polished thin-sections, it >> is possible the do optical mineralogy and using the results from whole rock >> oxide analysis for bulk FeO/MnO ration vs. % Anorthite, using the >> Michel-Levy Method (an optical mineralogy method), the Parent Body can be >> determined between Mars, Earth, Asteroid 4 Vesta, Moon, and Angrites. The >> Parent Body is Mars. >> >> >> Then the geochemistry evidence comes from the whole rock oxide analysis data >> from private industry company that is very professional, well respected, and >> a very well-known lab used by many University geology departments. From this >> data the igneous rock classification can be made, as well as many of the >> tests that verify/prove the Parent Body origin of the Achondrite meteorite. >> The results of all the following 8 tests prove the Parent Body is Mars: >> bulk FeO/MnO ration vs. % Anorthite using the Michel-Levy Method (an optical >> mineralogy method), Mg/Si (wt. ratio) vs. Al/Si (wt. ratio), ppm K vs. ppm >> La graph, K/La vs. La (ppm) graph, MnO (wt.%) vs. FeO (wt.%) graph, K2O >> (wt.%) vs. La (ppm) graph, Cr (ppm) vs. Mg # graph; GSA/vfcl, GSB/vfcl, vfcl >> vs. REE (g/t) proves GSA and GSB match the same PB. Together all of these >> tests verify/prove the Parent Body is Mars. >> >> >> GSA and GSB are 2 key type sample representative specimens from the >> meteorite discovery site. All the other 1000s of fragments are from the same >> meteorite fall event and discovery site footprint. Some of these fragments >> are bigger in mass than the famous Zagami Mars meteorite. >> >> >> http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/TheEvidenceGSA.html >> >> http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/TheEvidenceGSB.html >> >> >> >> >> They are what they are, Mars meteorites. The US World Record Mars Meteorite >> Discovery is a reality. The World-wide meteoritics community better start >> getting used to the idea. >> >> >> >> >> Glyn Howard >> >> >> >> >> Recall: Both my sister Ann Cain (who opened the email account) and I, Glyn >> Howard, use the same email account: >> Ann Cain, Glyn Howard >> gfndit(at)hotmail.com<http://hotmail.com/> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: Meteorite-list >> <meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com<mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com>> >> on behalf of Anne Black via Meteorite-list >> <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com<mailto:meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>> >> Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 7:49 PM >> To: j...@lutzon.com<mailto:j...@lutzon.com>; >> meteoritem...@gmail.com<mailto:meteoritem...@gmail.com> >> Cc: >> meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com<mailto:meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> >> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] WR Gallery Delay – U.S. World Record Mars >> Meteorite Discovery >> >> WOW!!! >> >> So many pictures, explanations, graphs, ....... so much wasted time and >> energy. >> And not one single Martin meteorite in sight!!! >> >> >> Anne M. Black >> www.IMPACTIKA.com<http://www.impactika.com/> >> impact...@aol.com<mailto:impact...@aol.com> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: John Lutzon via Meteorite-list >> <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com<mailto:meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>> >> To: Galactic Stone & Ironworks >> <meteoritem...@gmail.com<mailto:meteoritem...@gmail.com>> >> Cc: meteorite-list >> <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com<mailto:meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>> >> Sent: Sat, Apr 23, 2016 5:45 pm >> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] WR Gallery Delay – U.S. World Record Mars >> Meteorite Discovery >> >> Buckle your seat belts, here we go again.....----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Galactic Stone & Ironworks via Meteorite-list" >> <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.coml...@meteoritecentral.com<http://meteoritecentral.com/>>To: >> "Ann Cain" <Gfndit@hotmail.comgfn...@hotmail.com<http://hotmail.com/>>Cc: >> <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.coml...@meteoritecentral.com<http://meteoritecentral.com/>>Sent: >> Saturday, April 23, 2016 6:56 PMSubject: Re: [meteorite-list]WR Gallery >> Delay – U.S. World Record Mars Meteorite DiscoveryWhere were these >> classified and by whom?On 4/23/16, Ann Cain via >> Meteorite-list<meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.coml...@meteoritecentral.com<http://meteoritecentral.com/>> >> wrote:> Meteorite List,>> I would like to apologize for not having The >> Gallery of World Record Mars> Meteorites, from the US World Record Mars >> Meteorite Discovery, ready and up> for viewing for this Passover 4-23-16, as >> I said I would. Things have been> very busy this school year. However, this >> summer I will finish. I now intend> to have it ready on Rosh Hashanah 5777 >> AD/CE, (October 3-4, 2016), and I’m> hoping a 3rd PR can be released at >> that time in addition.>>> Rosh Hashanah 5777 AD/CE should be a good year of >> blessings, and I’m looking> forward to a new U.S. administration.>>>> >> Shalom,>>> Glyn Howard>>>>>> The Gallery of US World Record Mars Meteorite >> specimens:> http://gfoundit-mars.com/GalleryOfImages.html>>> The Evidence >> for GSA and GSB Mars Meteorites and Relevant Essays and> Articles> >> http://gfoundit-mars.com/TheEvidence.html>>> The Evidence - G Found It - US >> World Record Mars Meteorite Discovery> >> http://www.einpresswire.com/article/225047567/the-evidence-g-found-it-us-world-record-mars-meteorite-discovery>>> >> G Found It - U.S. World Record Mars Meteorite Discovery> >> http://www.gfoundit-mars.com/>>> G Found It – U.S. World Record Mars >> Meteorite Discovery> >> http://www.einpresswire.com/article/143477981/g-found-it-u-s-world-record-mars-meteorite-discovery>>>>>> >> Recall: Both my sister Ann Cain (who opened the email account) and I, Glyn> >> Howard, use the same email account …> Ann Cain, Glyn Howard> >> gfndit(at)hotmail.com<http://hotmail.com/>>>>> >> ______________________________________________>> Visit our Facebook page >> https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the> Archives at >> http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com<http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com/>> >> Meteorite-list mailing list> >> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.coml...@meteoritecentral.com<http://meteoritecentral.com/>> >> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list>-- >> ----------------------------------------------------www.galactic-stone.comwww.facebook.com/galacticstonewww.twitter.com/galacticstonewww.pinterest.com/galacticstonewww.instagram.com/galacticstonewww.ello.co/galacticstonewww.tsu.com/galacticstone----------------------------------------------------______________________________________________Visit<http://www.galactic-stone.comwww.facebook.com/galacticstonewww.twitter.com/galacticstonewww.pinterest.com/galacticstonewww.instagram.com/galacticstonewww.ello.co/galacticstonewww.tsu.com/galacticstone----------------------------------------------------______________________________________________Visit> >> our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the >> Archives at >> http://www.meteorite-list-archives.comMeteorite-list<http://www.meteorite-list-archives.commeteorite-list/> >> mailing >> listMeteorite-list@meteoritecentral.comlist@meteoritecentral.comhttps://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list______________________________________________Visit<http://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list______________________________________________Visit> >> our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the >> Archives at >> http://www.meteorite-list-archives.comMeteorite-list<http://www.meteorite-list-archives.commeteorite-list/> >> mailing >> listMeteorite-list@meteoritecentral.comlist@meteoritecentral.comhttps://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list<http://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list> >> ______________________________________________ >> >> Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the >> Archives at >> http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com<http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com/> >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com<mailto:Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> >> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> ______________________________________________ >> >> Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the >> Archives at >> http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com<http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com/> >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com<mailto:Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> >> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ > > Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the > Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ > > Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the > Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
