Hello List, I have to stand with Gregory on this one. Mike Farmer said
"I have to agree, I looked at the auction, NOWHERE does it say that it is a
meteorite."
Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier <><
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom aka James Knudson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] IMCA member offering questionable meteorite
Hello List, I have to stand with Gregory on this one. Mike Farmer said
"I have to agree, I looked at the auction, NOWHERE does it say that it is
a
meteorite."
But, NOWHERE does it say it is NOT a meteorite.
Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier <><
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] IMCA member offering questionable
meteorite
Ok, I agree with this much, if he is a member of the IMCA, then he
should put into words that it is NOT a meteorite.
The auction has now closed, and it was won (for $1.25 !) by a gentleman
I recognize, as he has bought many meteorites from me, and many dealers I
know, in the past. I'd be willing to bet a margarita in Tucson '04 that he
THOUGHT he was bidding on a meteorite. Now, this buyer's
less-than-perceptive interpretation of the wording is just as unfortunate as
the seller's less-than-ideal writing of it, but point is, the erroneous
assumption was made. With any luck, both buyer and seller will be a little
smarter when this thing is hashed out. I'm sure Rhett will relay the
seller's response asap.
Gregory
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
