Yes John,
But if it turns out to be true that this lunar never was in the Taklamakan
desert, it should be made public, just like Shirokovsky and others. So the
records and the Met.Bulletin can be corrected.
Anne blackimpactika.comimpact...@aol.com
On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 03:01:48 AM MST, John Lutzon via
Meteorite-list <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
Hello, my best..
Meteorite-list is a avenue for people to discuss meteorite related
topics--right?
Recently, (2/20/24), a Lunar (frag, breccia), Pakepake 005, from China was
picture posted online. The comments regarding the circumstances of this find
appeared to question its find location and the finders integrity without
foundation.
I fully agree with the comment to OUT the scammers. But, before computer
keyboard destroying a finder/seller's reputation --- say How/Why.
As said, product misrepresentation in any business is old hat. Caveat Emptor.
Should someone have information regarding this finder, I would be interested,
(Privately).
Regards, John Lutzon
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
