Dear List and Adam, I do not have my copy of MetBase 6.0 yet so it is difficult for me to compare the latest SNCs numbers but... ;-)
What about somebody who have a time and knowledge (Adam?) will make a mathematic formula to compare hot/cold deserts finds? Something like that: Deserts Finds: QOF = ((n * t)/S) * LUCK * EXPIRIENSE QOF = Quantity Of Finds n = quantity of nomads or other meteorite hunters or scientists involved in prospecting for meteorites t = average time of one nomad (hunter, scientist) searching for meteorites S = area in square km LUCK - I don't know the math for that yet ;-) EXPIRIENSE - All I know about this parameter is that it is going better time wise Sure you can add some parameters for moving ice in Antarctica to enlarge the "S". But... you have to accept that penguins were witness of the falls (too bad we can't understand it yet) Anyway: (Non-Antarctic MINUS witness falls) in compare for the deserts. Sergey > Dear List, > > It is interesting to note that the Non-Antarctic to Antarctic ratio is > different when it comes to planetary material. > > SNCs > Qty Non-Antarctic Qty Antarctic > 18 10 > > Lunar > Qty Non-Antarctic Qty Antarctic > 15 12 > > > This ratio is also starting to favor other rare material. The desert is > proving to be bountiful for new study material. > > All the best, > > Adam > > > > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
