Ok, and in this “reduced reaction”, Barium Fluoride would not be considered an ‘oxide’.. ? correct ?

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Wu
Sent:
Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:40 PM
To: Charles R. Viau; meteorite-list
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Serious question?

 

Two linked reactions: One is "oxidized"; the other is "reduced".

 

Howard Wu

 

"Charles R. Viau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Ok, so for the symantics of that definition, would you call that a “reduction reaction not involving oxygen”, and not “oxidation” .. ?

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of S. Singletary
Sent:
Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Serious question?

 

At 08:10 PM 9/17/2003 -0400, Charles R. Viau wrote:


Oxidation -  Definition -> Combining a substance with oxygen.


Strictly speaking oxidation is the loss of electrons.  The electrons need somewhere to go so something is going to gain electrons and that is the reduction part.  So to undergo oxidation, something has to be reduced - usually it's oxygen that accepts the wayward electrons but it doesn't always have to be so.

For example:
Ba + F
2 -> BaF2 is an oxidation-reduction reaction that doesn't involve oxygen.  Here F is the oxydizing agent.

Steven



Steven Singletary
54-1224
Dept. Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences
M.I.T.
Cambridge, MA, 02139
Tel-617.253.6398
Fax-617.253.7102

Blue Skies!


Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger

Reply via email to